by Calculated Risk on 12/31/2010 10:25:00 AM
Friday, December 31, 2010
Problem Banks: Stress by State
Some more interesting data from Surferdude808:
With the banking crisis ending its third year, it may prove useful to identify which states have experienced the most stress.
At year-end 2007, there were 8,536 insured institutions headquartered in the 50 states, D.C., and Puerto Rico. Since that time, 1,340 or 15.7 percent have either failed or made an appearance on the Unofficial Problem Bank List (see table below).
When ranking markets with a minimum of 15 institutions at year-end 2007, Arizona has experienced the most stress with 45.6 percent of its institutions having failed or being identified as a problem. Washington is a close second at 45.4 percent. The other stressed banking states that rank in the top ten include Nevada (43 percent), Oregon (40 percent), Florida (37 percent), Georgia (34 percent), California (34 percent), Utah (32 percent), Idaho (26 percent), and Colorado (25 percent).
The common theme among these is overexposure to commercial real estate lending, particularly residential construction & development loans, and the collapse of real estate markets. At the other end of the spectrum with comparatively little stress include Iowa (4.3 percent), New Hampshire (4.2 percent), and West Virginia (1.5 percent). Vermont is the only state that has not experienced a failed institution or one appearing on the Unofficial Problem Bank List.
State | 2007 Count | 20101 | Removals2 | Failures3 | Total4 | % 5 | Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AK | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 47 | ||
AL | 160 | 24 | 4 | 28 | 17.5% | 16 | |
AR | 150 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 12.0% | 25 |
AZ | 57 | 15 | 2 | 9 | 26 | 45.6% | 1 |
CA | 313 | 65 | 6 | 34 | 105 | 33.5% | 7 |
CO | 159 | 33 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 25.2% | 10 |
CT | 56 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 14.3% | 23 | |
DC | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 47 | ||
DE | 33 | 3 | 3 | 9.1% | 33 | ||
FL | 317 | 67 | 4 | 45 | 116 | 36.6% | 5 |
GA | 352 | 64 | 4 | 51 | 119 | 33.8% | 6 |
HI | 9 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 47 | ||
IA | 391 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 4.3% | 44 |
ID | 19 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 26.3% | 9 | |
IL | 671 | 65 | 1 | 38 | 104 | 15.5% | 20 |
IN | 162 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 10.5% | 27 |
KS | 357 | 32 | 5 | 7 | 44 | 12.3% | 24 |
KY | 206 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 9.7% | 29 |
LA | 162 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6.2% | 39 |
MA | 181 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5.5% | 41 |
MD | 97 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 21.6% | 12 | |
ME | 34 | 2 | 2 | 5.9% | 40 | ||
MI | 164 | 22 | 3 | 10 | 35 | 21.3% | 13 |
MN | 443 | 65 | 2 | 15 | 82 | 18.5% | 15 |
MO | 361 | 26 | 3 | 11 | 40 | 11.1% | 26 |
MS | 97 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 5.2% | 42 | |
MT | 79 | 14 | 1 | 15 | 19.0% | 14 | |
NC | 112 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 16.1% | 18 |
ND | 97 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 5.2% | 42 | |
NE | 248 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 6.9% | 38 |
NH | 24 | 1 | 1 | 4.2% | 45 | ||
NJ | 127 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 15.7% | 19 |
NM | 53 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 17.0% | 17 | |
NV | 44 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 19 | 43.2% | 3 |
NY | 203 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 10.3% | 28 |
OH | 265 | 19 | 2 | 4 | 25 | 9.4% | 31 |
OK | 259 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 7.7% | 37 |
OR | 40 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 40.0% | 4 |
PA | 246 | 17 | 3 | 20 | 8.1% | 36 | |
PR | 10 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.0% | 47 | |
RI | 13 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.0% | 47 | |
SC | 93 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 23.7% | 11 |
SD | 89 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 9.0% | 34 | |
TN | 203 | 17 | 1 | 18 | 8.9% | 35 | |
TX | 659 | 48 | 7 | 8 | 63 | 9.6% | 30 |
UT | 68 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 32.4% | 8 | |
VA | 119 | 16 | 2 | 18 | 15.1% | 22 | |
VT | 16 | 0 | 0.0% | 47 | |||
WA | 97 | 28 | 2 | 14 | 44 | 45.4% | 2 |
WI | 296 | 39 | 3 | 3 | 45 | 15.2% | 21 |
WV | 68 | 1 | 1 | 1.5% | 46 | ||
WY | 43 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9.3% | 32 |
Totals | 8,536 | 935 | 82 | 323 | 1,340 | 15.7% |
2 Unofficial Problem Bank List Removals (ex-Failures)
3 Failures (2008-2010)
4 Total Failures, UPBL, & UPBL Removals (ex-Failures)
5 Total failures, UBPL, and UPBL ex-failures to 2007 count (a percentage for states with less than 15 institutions is not determined because of possible skew to ranking).