by Calculated Risk on 5/18/2014 09:07:00 AM

Here is a price index for commercial real estate that I follow. 

From CoStar: Major Commercial Real Estate Price Indices Advance In First Quarter

BROAD PRICING INDICES MOVE UPWARD IN FIRST QUARTER: The two broadest measures of aggregate pricing for commercial properties within the CCRSI — the value-weighted U.S. Composite Index and the equal-weighted U.S. Composite Index — each finished the first quarter of 2014 on a positive note. The U.S. equal-weighted index, which represents lower-value properties, has the most momentum in early 2014, with pricing up 4.2% for the first quarter of 2014 and 17.1% year-over-year. Meanwhile the U.S. value-weighted index, which is more heavily weighted toward larger, higher-value properties, has already recovered to within 5% of its prior peak levels. As a result, pricing gains in the value-weighted Composite Index have slowed, advancing by a more modest 0.5% for the first quarter and 10.1% for the year ending in March 2014.
...
The percentage of commercial property selling at distressed prices has also fallen by more than two-thirds from the peak levels reached in 2011, to just 10% of all composite pair trades in the first quarter of 2014.
...
The Multifamily Index continued to post steady growth, advancing by 7.8% for the 12 months ended March 2014, even though pricing in the Prime Metros Index has surpassed its previous peak set in 2007 by 10%. Pricing in the overall Multifamily Index is now within 8% of its pre-recession peak.Given the steep competition and pricing for Class A assets in prime metro areas, recent pricing gains likely reflect shifting investor interest to Class B properties in primary markets and higher quality properties in secondary and tertiary markets.
emphasis added

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph from CoStar shows the Primary Property Type Quarterly indexes. Multi-family has recovered the most, and offices the least.

Note: These are repeat sales indexes - like Case-Shiller for residential - but this is based on far fewer pairs.