Friday, January 27, 2017

Philly Fed: State Coincident Indexes increased in 41 states in December

From the Philly Fed:
The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia has released the coincident indexes for the 50 states for December 2016. In the past month, the indexes increased in 41 states, decreased in two, and remained stable in seven, for a one-month diffusion index of 78. Over the past three months, the indexes increased in 47 states, decreased in two, and remained stable in one, for a three-month diffusion index of 90.
Note: These are coincident indexes constructed from state employment data. An explanation from the Philly Fed:
The coincident indexes combine four state-level indicators to summarize current economic conditions in a single statistic. The four state-level variables in each coincident index are nonfarm payroll employment, average hours worked in manufacturing, the unemployment rate, and wage and salary disbursements deflated by the consumer price index (U.S. city average). The trend for each state’s index is set to the trend of its gross domestic product (GDP), so long-term growth in the state’s index matches long-term growth in its GDP.
Philly Fed.Philly Fed Number of States with Increasing ActivityClick on graph for larger image.

This is a graph is of the number of states with one month increasing activity according to the Philly Fed. This graph includes states with minor increases (the Philly Fed lists as unchanged).

In December 46 states had increasing activity (including minor increases).

The downturn in 2015 and 2016, in the number of states increasing, was mostly related to the decline in oil prices. Now that oil prices have recovered somewhat, most states are increasing again.

Philly Fed State Conincident Map Here is a map of the three month change in the Philly Fed state coincident indicators. This map was all red during the worst of the recession, and almost all green now.

Source: Philly Fed. Note: For complaints about red / green issues, please contact the Philly Fed.

3 comments:

  1. Are things so glorious here, we dont need to be mean to mexico?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Who's being mean to Mexico? Respecting a common border is respecting their national sovreignty. Inasmuch as a secure border reduces narco gang activity it helps Mexico. Rational, trusted immigration processes means Mexicans in the US will no longer be under suspicion and enjoy the full protections of being a US resident. Lots of MX pluses which is why they should pay for it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I just don't see any of that happening tho I wish it would. Fair enforcement would have to be maintained for years.
    Liz

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.