In Depth Analysis: CalculatedRisk Newsletter on Real Estate (Ad Free) Read it here.

Friday, February 03, 2006

Employment Report

by Calculated Risk on 2/03/2006 01:32:00 PM

The employment report was mostly ho hum. The exception was the drop in the unemployment rate to 4.7%.


Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows employment growth for Bush's second term. So far job growth has been about as expected. So why has the unemployment rate decreased?

The answer has to do with the employment participation rate. Over the last 5 years, the civilian noninstitutional population has added about 2.7 million people per year (those 16 years and over). Over the last 12 months the population has added 2.716 million - in line with previous years.

However, over the last 5 years, only about 1.2 million people per year have joined the civilian labor force. This is very puzzling, especially since it is unlikely that the baby boomers are retiring in significant numbers yet. More likely there is a fairly large group of people that would choose to join the labor force with higher incentives. Therefore I think, even with a 4.7% unemployment rate, there is still substantial slack in the labor market and the US will not see wage inflation pressures in the short term.

Once again, construction played a significant role in employment gains. For more, see Kash's Job Growth by Industry.

Thursday, February 02, 2006

US housing bubbles: Half froth?

by Calculated Risk on 2/02/2006 03:06:00 PM

The New Economist reviews the HSBC report: A Froth-Finding Mission: detecting US housing bubbles

The report itself concludes that the "glass is half froth":

We suggest that about half of the US housing market is frothy and that this ‘bubble zone’ may be overvalued by as much as 35-40%, after taking into account low interest rates and tax advantages. Current valuations imply a large permanent reduction in the risk premium and/or a sizable step up in future capital gains, not all of which, we think, is justified. ... Therefore, when these housing bubbles begin to deflate, it is likely to have substantial macroeconomic consequences.
The New Economist is not overly concerned:
I do not consider this to be the greatest threat facing the US or global economy. As I have argued before, the experience of both the Reserve Bank of Australian and Bank of England is that housing bubbles can successfully be deflated over a 2-3 year period by steady rate hikes and clear, consistent messages to investors. If the Federal Reserve is able to follow their example - and there's no obvious reason why they can't - that would detract around 1.0 to 1.5 percentage points a year from GDP growth. Enough to drag annual US growth below trend, but nowhere near recession territory.
I'm not quite as sanguine.

Fed's Bies Warns on Nontraditional Mortgages

by Calculated Risk on 2/02/2006 12:58:00 PM

Here are FED Governor Susan Schmidt Bies' comments on nontraditional mortgage products, from her speech today at the Financial Services Institute:

The U.S. banking agencies have also issued draft guidance on certain mortgage products. Over the past few years, the agencies have observed an increase in the volume of originations for residential mortgage loans that allow borrowers to defer repayment of principal and, sometimes, interest. These mortgage loans, often referred to as “nontraditional mortgage loans,” include “interest-only” (IO) mortgage loans, in which a borrower pays no loan principal for the first few years of the loan, and “payment-option” adjustable-rate mortgages (option ARMs), in which a borrower has flexible payment options--and which also could result in negative amortization.

In 2005, option ARMs and IOs were an estimated one-third of total U.S. mortgage originations. By contrast, in 2003, these products were estimated to represent less than 10 percent of total originations. Despite the recent publicity, however, it is estimated that these mortgages still account for less than 20 percent of aggregate domestic mortgage outstandings of $8 trillion. While the credit quality of residential mortgages generally remains strong, the Federal Reserve and other banking supervisors are concerned that current risk-management techniques may not fully address the level of risk in nontraditional mortgages, a risk that would be heightened by a downturn in the housing market.

Nontraditional mortgage products have been available for many years; however, these types of mortgages were historically offered to higher-income borrowers only. More recently, these products have been offered to a wider spectrum of consumers, including subprime borrowers who may be less suited for these types of mortgages and may not fully recognize their embedded risks. These borrowers are more likely to experience an unmanageable payment shock at some point during the life of the loan, which means they may be more likely to default on the loan. Further, nontraditional mortgage loans are becoming more prevalent in the subprime market at the same time that risk tolerances in the capital markets have increased. When risk spreads return to more “normal” levels, banks need to be prepared for the resulting impact on liquidity and pricing. Supervisors have also observed that lenders are increasingly combining nontraditional mortgage loans with weaker mitigating controls on credit exposures, such as allowing reduced documentation in evaluating the applicant’s creditworthiness and making simultaneous second-lien mortgages as competition in the mortgage banking industry intensifies. These “risk layering” practices have become more and more prevalent in mortgage originations. Thus, while elements of the product structure may have been used successfully by some banks in the past, the absence of traditional underwriting controls may have unforeseen effects on losses realized in these products.

In view of these industry trends, the Federal Reserve and the other banking agencies decided to issue the draft guidance on nontraditional mortgage products. The proposed guidance emphasizes that an institution’s risk-management processes should allow it to adequately identify, measure, monitor, and control the risk associated with these products. The guidance reminds lenders of the importance of assessing a borrower’s ability to repay a loan, including monthly payments when amortization begins and interest rates rise. Lenders should recognize that certain nontraditional mortgage loans are untested in a stressed environment; for instance, nontraditional mortgage loans to investors that rely on collateral values could be particularly affected by a housing price decline. Bankers should ensure that borrowers have sufficient information so that they clearly understand, before choosing a product or payment option, the terms and associated risks of these loans, particularly how far monthly payments can rise and that negative amortization can increase the amount owed on the property above what was originally borrowed. These products warrant strong risk-management standards as well as appropriate capital and loan-loss reserves.
Recently mortgage lenders have asked for an extension of the comment period to respond to the new guidance. I haven't seen if this extension has been granted.

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

Fiscal 2006: Record YTD Increase in National Debt

by Calculated Risk on 2/01/2006 03:02:00 PM

"By passing these reforms, we will save the American taxpayer another $14 billion next year, and stay on track to cut the deficit in half by 2009." George W. Bush, SOTU Address, Jan 31, 2006
After four months, Fiscal 2006 continues to set new records for the YTD increase in National Debt. For the first four months of fiscal year 2006, the National Debt increased $263.4 Billion to $8.196 Trillion as of Jan 31, 2006.


Click on graph for larger image.

The previous record for the first four months was in fiscal 2005 with an increase in the National Debt of $248.7 Billion.

Each month I will plot the YTD increase in the National Debt and compare it to the proceeding years. I expect fiscal 2006 to set a new record for the annual increase in the National Debt.

NOTE: I quoted the SOTU address last night for two reasons: first, $14 Billion is an inconsequental amount compared to the US budget, and second, there is no way the US will "cut the deficit in half" by 2009. George W. Bush has no credibility on the budget:
"... our budget will run a deficit that will be small and short-term" George W. Bush, SOTU Address, Jan 29, 2002

Mortgage Application Volume Declines, Rates Rise

by Calculated Risk on 2/01/2006 11:01:00 AM

The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) reports: Mortgage Application Volume Declines In Latest Survey

Click on graph for larger image.

The Market Composite Index — a measure of mortgage loan application volume was 626.8 – a decrease of 5.1 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from 660.5 one week earlier. On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 9.1 percent compared with the previous week but was down 12.1 percent compared with the same week one year earlier.

The seasonally-adjusted Purchase Index decreased by 8.0 percent to 435.7 from 473.7 the previous week whereas the Refinance Index decreased by 1.5 percent to 1747.2 from 1773.9 one week earlier.
Rates on mortgages increased:
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages increased to 6.20 percent from 6.04 percent one week earlier ...

The average contract interest rate for one-year ARMs increased to 5.48 percent from 5.44 percent one week earlier ...
Activity is still high, but falling again as mortgage rates are once again rising.

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Bush: "America Addicted to Oil"

by Calculated Risk on 1/31/2006 05:37:00 PM

The AP is reporting:

President Bush ... [will say] Tuesday that "America is addicted to oil" and must break its dependence on foreign suppliers in unstable parts of the world.
The problem is not the source of the oil, but that America is addicted to oil in general. Oil is a global market, and to break the addiction the US needs to reduce consumption, not drill for more domestic oil. Unfortunately Bush's energy policies have been focused primarily on oil, even promoting the consumption of more oil with tax breaks for small businesses that buy large SUVs. From 2003:
This year, the perks of buying a large SUV — if you're a small business owner — got even bigger.

Congress recently passed a tax bill, as proposed in President Bush's economic stimulus plan, that offers a $100,000 tax credit for business owners who purchase any vehicle weighing 6,000 pounds or more when fully loaded.
There are several benefits of moving away from oil; economic, geopolitical and environmental. Hopefully, Bush will not call for more domestic drilling (a huge mistake), but instead call for new innovation and more conservation.

Monday, January 30, 2006

Fed Funds Rate: 4.5% almost guaranteed

by Calculated Risk on 1/30/2006 07:27:00 PM

Dr. Altig provides the Fed Funds probabilities for the next 3 meetings:

Jan 31st:
4.5%, 97%

March 28th:
4.75%, 73%
4.5%, 20%

May 10th:
4.75%, 53%
5%, 28%
4.5% 15%
So even with the dissapointing GDP data, it appears the market expects at least two more rate hikes. Dr. Duy channels the Fed with his always insightful Fed Watch: Now It Gets Interesting...
For the Fed watcher, the 4Q05 GDP report is a real brainteaser. The central focus of the many, many blogs covering Friday’s news was the disappointing growth numbers (see William Polley’s and James Hamilton’s views, the latter including a long list of similar concerns). To be sure, the weak headline number deserved attention. But I was surprised by the relatively little attention placed on the inflation reading. I doubt the Fed is going to let that number slip by so lightly. Weak growth and higher inflation? Now that’s interesting.
And on the topic of inflation, Fed Economist Mike Bryan writes: Holding on to the Edge of Comfort
Today’s PCE inflation report for December seems to have gotten a ho-hum response in financial markets. As it should. The data were tame and not widely off expectations.
Not everyone agrees with Dr. Bryan's take on inflation (see Barry Ritholtz' Myths of the Greenspan Era). As a caveat, Dr. Bryan is writing for himself and not the Fed. Still its interesting to read his views.

30 year Pleasure Boat Loans

by Calculated Risk on 1/30/2006 02:04:00 PM

The LA Times reports: Sales of Pleasure Boats Buoyed by Soaring Home Values

California's hot real estate market has helped power a rise in boat sales by allowing people to borrow against the soaring value of their homes to buy boats and other big-ticket items.

In California, retail sales of recreational boats — from runabouts to $4-million luxury yachts — rose about 8% last year to a record $540 million, continuing a growth trend over the last five years, according to the Southern California Marine Assn. A similar increase is expected in 2006.

Though some economists worry that too many people are overextending themselves, the boating industry considers itself lucky that business is humming despite high gasoline prices.

"A lot of people are taking money out of their homes and buying different things, and one of them — fortunately — is boats," said Dave Geoffroy, executive director of the marine association, the organizer of the L.A. Boat Show.
A couple of comments: I guess a 30 year loan on a pleasure boat is better financial planning than a 30 year loan for a hamburger!

But what happens when mortgage equity withdrawal slows?
... some dealers worry that boat sales could fall if real estate values drop, which happened in the early 1990s.

"I'm moderately concerned," said Michael Basso Jr., general manager of Sun Country Marine, which sells family boats and has locations in Castaic, Dana Point and Ontario.

He noted that half his buyers last year paid in cash, often from money they pulled out of their homes.
I wonder if the slowdown in Q4 (1.1% annualized growth in GDP) was related to a slowdown in equity extraction? The Federal Reserve's Flow of Funds report (due March 9th) will help answer that question.

Friday, January 27, 2006

December New Home Sales: 1.269 Million Annual Rate

by Calculated Risk on 1/27/2006 12:16:00 AM

According to the Census Bureau report, New Home Sales in December were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.269 million vs. market expectations of 1.225 million. November's sales were revised down slightly to 1.233 million from 1.245 million.


Click on Graph for larger image.

NOTE: The graph starts at 700 thousand units per month to better show monthly variation.



The Not Seasonally Adjusted monthly rate was 86,000 New Homes sold, essentially the same as the 85,000 in November.

On a year over year basis, December 2005 sales were 3.6% higher than December 2004.



The median and average sales prices are trending down.

The median sales price of new houses sold in November 2005 was $225,200; the average sales price was $283,300.



The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of December was 516,000. This represents a supply of 4.9 months at the current sales rate.

The 516,000 units of inventory is the all time record for new houses for sale. On a months of supply basis, inventory is above the level of recent years.

This report is still reasonably strong.

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Lenders ask for Extension on New Mortgage Guidance

by Calculated Risk on 1/26/2006 01:14:00 AM

In December the FDIC, Office of the Comptroller, the Federal Reserve and other agencies issued a new proposed guidance on nontraditional mortgage products.

Now Reuters reports: US banks seek more mortgage proposal comment time

Lenders this week asked U.S. regulators to extend a comment period on a proposal that urged tighter underwriting on new mortgage products that may pose greater risks for banks and borrowers as interest rates rise.

Comments were due Feb. 27, but lenders have asked the Federal Reserve and other regulators for 30 more days.

"The proposal is extremely complex and has far-reaching consequences for our members, as well as for the nation's mortgage markets," wrote Janet Frank, director of mortgage finance in America's Community Bankers' government relations office.

"We believe that it will take an additional 30 days to complete the necessary evaluation and collect comments and data from our membership," Frank told regulators in a letter.

The Consumer Mortgage Coalition and HSBC North America Holdings Inc. also requested an additional 30 days.

Spokesmen for the Fed and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency were not immediately available to comment.