by Calculated Risk on 11/28/2006 10:26:00 AM

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reports: Existing Home Sales Rise in October, Market Stabilizing


Click on graph for larger image.

Total existing-home sales – including single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops – rose 0.5 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate1 of 6.24 million units in October from an upwardly revised pace of 6.21 million in September, but were 11.5 percent below the 7.05 million-unit level in October 2005.

Total housing inventory levels increased 1.9 percent at the end of October to 3.85 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 7.4-month supply at the current sales pace.

Existing Home Sales are a trailing indicator. The sales are reported at close of escrow, so October sales reflects agreements reached in August and September.


As I've noted before, usually 6 to 8 months of inventory starts causing pricing problem - and over 8 months a significant problem. With current inventory levels at 7.4 months of supply, inventories are now well into the danger zone and prices are falling in most regions.

by Calculated Risk on 11/27/2006 04:24:00 PM

Dow Jones reports: Ameriquest Mortgage Hires JPMorgan To Advise On Sale

A reminder for CEOs: Never name a stadium, it's bad luck.



Ameriquest Field (named in May 2004), Arlington, Texas. Home of the Texas Rangers.

by Calculated Risk on 11/27/2006 12:31:00 PM

Via the WSJ Markebeat: Distant Early Warning (hat tip: K-Dawg)

The Federal Reserve had some idea of the problems posed by inflated housing values back in 2002, according to summaries of meetings held by the Federal Advisory Council, a group comprised of the Fed governors and a dozen representatives from regional and national banks. The FAC meets quarterly to discuss monetary policy, financial regulation and other matters — summaries are released with a three-year lag — and in December 2002, during Alan Greenspan’s tenure, the council was already warning of problems related to housing. Although the signs were limited, the summary shows that the Fed was already discussing the possibility of a housing bubble as much as four years ago, not long after the technology-stock bubble burst.

“Whereas evidence of a ‘housing bubble’ is anecdotal and regionalized, the Council does express concern that housing prices will not be able to rise at this pace forever,” the summary says. “Levels of home equity have been supported by these increased housing values but should those values begin to fall, lenders will be faced with higher loan to value ratios and with little room for the problems created by a potential downturn in the economy.”

Click on image for larger view.

From Federal Advisory Council (FAC) minutes, December 6, 2002. Note: Paragraph on consumer credit removed.

The FAC included members of the banking industry and Wall Street. See document for members.

by Calculated Risk on 11/27/2006 12:25:00 AM

From the WaPo: Commercial Boom Softens Housing Bust

To understand why the housing slump hasn't dragged the economy into a recession, it helps to visit the Smoketown Plaza in Woodbridge, where the thumping of hammers signals the healthy pulse of a building boom that's still going strong.
...
[These commercial projects have boosted] non-residential construction enough over the past year to more than offset the decline in home construction. That boom is helping to cushion the impact of the housing slump on the economy.

The main reasons the housing bust hasn't dragged the economy into a recession yet, are: 1) there have been few layoffs in residential construction (they are coming), and 2) mortgage equity withdrawal (MEW) has still been strong (MEW will slow soon). The boom in non-residential construction has helped, but if the bust follows the typical pattern, the non-residential boom will end soon (or is already ending).

The money spent on private non-residential construction nationally rose a sizzling 19.2 percent over the 12 months that ended in September, according to Census data. In addition, state and local governments are building roads, schools and other public buildings. Public construction rose a robust 11.6 percent in the year ended in September.

Add it all up and the increase in non-residential work more than offset the 6.7 percent decline in home building over the same period, so the value of all construction rose a net 2.9 percent.

These YoY numbers are correct, but the picture is different if you look at the last 6 months. Total nominal private construction spending peaked in May, and has declined since then. Total construction spending, including public spending, peaked in June.

Builders of non-residential projects say they are simply playing catch-up. So many new neighborhoods filled up during the housing boom that they're still building the stores, offices, restaurants, bank branches, hotels and hospitals needed to serve the influx of residents.

In Prince William County, for example, the population surged by 23 percent in the past five years, during the peak of the home-building boom, to 374,678 people. Now, many residents complain they have to drive too far, often to Fairfax County, for basic business services.

The companies that provide those services "don't build until they see the rooftops" over new customers, said Bill Fairchild, president of R.W. Murray Co., a construction contractor in Manassas that's overseeing the Arby's on Minnieville Road and a dozen other non-residential projects in Northern Virginia. "People have got to get groceries. They've got to get their hair cut. They need to go to the cleaners."

From a previous post, but worth repeating: YoY Residential Investment typically leads YoY Non-residential investment by 3 to 5 quarters.

Click on graph for larger image.
This graph shows the YoY change in residential investment vs. nonresidential investment. As I noted in August: In general, residential investment leads nonresidential investment. There are periods when this observation doesn't hold - like '95 when residential investment fell and the growth of nonresidential investment remained strong.

Another interesting period was 2001 when nonresidential investment fell significantly more than residential investment. Obviously the fall in nonresidential investment was related to the bursting of the stock market bubble. But typically changes in residential investment lead changes in nonresidential investment, and GDP, by three to five quarters.

As the article noted, companies don't build non-residential projects "until they see the rooftops" - and that is why there has been a non-residential boom - about 3 to 5 quarters behind the final residential boom. But the analysis in the article didn't take the next step - what happens to non-residential construction 3 to 5 quarters after the residential construction bust? The graph above provides the likely answer.

by Calculated Risk on 11/25/2006 06:39:00 PM

From AP: Black Friday sales up 6 percent over '05

The nation's retailers had a strong start to the holiday shopping season, according to results announced Saturday by a national research group that tracks sales at mall-based stores. One big exception was Wal-Mart Stores Inc., which said it expects to report same-store sales in November below its already lackluster forecast.

According to ShopperTrak RCT Corp., which tracks total sales at more than 45,000 mall-based retail outlets, total sales rose 6 percent to $8.96 billion on Friday, the start of the holiday shopping season, compared to the same day a year ago.

This is to balance out the previous post!

by Calculated Risk on 11/25/2006 01:23:00 PM

From Reuters: Wal-Mart sees weak sales as holiday season starts

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. predicted a rare decline in monthly sales on Saturday, even as U.S. bargain-hunters jammed stores in search of gifts at the start of the crucial holiday shopping season.
...
Wal-Mart estimated that November sales fell 0.1 percent at its U.S. stores open at least a year -- a closely watched retail measure known as same-store sales.

The retailer will provide a final monthly sales report on Thursday, when most other major chain stores report their November figures. This would mark Wal-Mart's first monthly same-store sales decline since April 1996.

Wal-Mart had expected same-store sales to be flat compared with the same period last year, which many Wall Street analysts had viewed as disappointing. Wal-Mart's four-week November sales period ended on Friday.

Holiday retail sales are important every year, but as the article noted:

Investors are watching holiday sales particularly closely this year to gauge how consumers are coping with a slowdown in the housing market that has already hurt home improvement retailers and furniture stores.

by Calculated Risk on 11/23/2006 01:11:00 AM

From AP: UBS: 2006 Subprime Loans Doing Badly

Subprime loans ... in particular those used to back mortgage bonds, could prove to be one of the worst-performing groups yet, according to UBS.

by Calculated Risk on 11/22/2006 10:42:00 AM

The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) reports: Mortgage Applications Fall in Latest Survey

Click on graph for larger image.

The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, was 623.6, a decrease of 3.7 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from 647.5 one week earlier.

The seasonally-adjusted Refinance Index decreased by 4.3 percent to 1935.3 from 2022.2 the previous week and the Purchase Index decreased by 2.8 percent to 401.4 from 412.9 one week earlier.

Mortgage rates were stable:

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 6.13 percent from 6.14 percent ...

The average contract interest rate for one-year ARMs increased to 5.88 percent from 5.87 ...

The second graph shows the Purchase Index and the 4 and 12 week moving averages since January 2002.

by Calculated Risk on 11/21/2006 06:59:00 PM

"The housing market, as you know, it has been hit, I think, harder than most of us had expected."
Edward Lazear, Q&A Nov 21, 2006, chairman of the White House's Council of Economic Advisers

During the housing boom, there were two distinct views of the causes of the boom. The consensus view was that the boom was mostly driven by fundamentals and perhaps a little "froth" in 2005.

The minority opinion was that the housing market had become a bubble. The minority view was based on evidence of speculation: flippers, a high percentage of investment purchases, and homebuyers using excessive leverage, especially with nontraditional mortgage products.

Now that the housing bust is here, there are also two views of the bust. The consensus view is that the "worst is over". The minority view is that the bust has a ways to go.

Not surprisingly, those that felt the boom was based on fundamentals now believe the worst is over. And those that felt the boom was driven by excessive speculation believe the housing market will continue to slowdown. How one viewed the housing boom colors how one looks at the housing bust.

All the evidence so far suggests the minority view was correct. The severity of the bust has caught the majority off guard as evidenced by Lazear's comments above. Here are Lazear's comments today on housing:

Question: I was wondering if you could talk more about your outlook for the housing market. Do you expect there to be -- it to bottom in 2007? And is the worst behind us in your opinion? And what are the risks, in your mind, of a recession?

And Lazear's answer:

CHAIRMAN LAZEAR: The housing market, as you know, it has been hit, I think, harder than most of us had expected. Most forecasters were expecting a slower decline. What that probably signals is that the future will not be as negative as it otherwise would have been because we've probably had much of the decline that we're expecting to have.

Maybe. The other possibility is that Lazear and most forecasters misunderstood the housing boom, and they remain too optimistic about the housing bust. Lazear:

That said, there are -- you know, there are a number of indications that things are still not as strong as they were last year in the housing market. You know, do I see that as a problem for the economy? Obviously, we don't like to see any one industry get hit and hit hard. That affects people's jobs. The good side of that, of course, has been that non-residential construction has taken up much of the slack in that industry. So we haven't seen construction jobs fall off dramatically as a result of the housing decline.

Residential construction is off $55 Billion (SAAR), and non-residential construction is up $38 Billion from December 2005 (Census Bureau, Construction Spending). So Lazear is correct that non-residential spending has "taken up much of the slack".

But Lazear is overlooking a few facts: Even though starts have fallen off a cliff, completions are still near record levels - and when completions fall (they trail starts by about 6 months), construction spending will drop significantly. Also, non-residential investment tends to trail residential investment.

And the reason residential construction jobs haven't fallen "off dramatically as a result of the housing decline" is jobs track housing completions (for obvious reasons). I've presented these graphs before, but they fit here ...

Click on graph for larger image.
The first graph shows Starts vs. Completions.

Starts have fallen "off a cliff", but completions have just started to fall.


This graph shows starts, completions and residential construction employment. (starts are shifted 6 months into the future). Completions and residential construction employment are highly correlated, and Completions lag Starts by about 6 months.

Based on historical correlations, it is reasonable to expect Completions and residential construction employment to follow Starts "off the cliff".

More Lazear:

And I would say that as we go forward what we'd be concerned about is employment in that industry and looking to see how it transmits to the rest of the economy. I don't believe that it is going to transmit to the rest of the economy. There's been no indication that it has. Other sectors remain strong. And that would be the primary danger that I would see from the housing market, whether it's bottomed out now or whether it will take another quarter or so to bottom out I think is still up for grabs, and I wouldn't want to speculate on it.

But I would be willing to tell you that I don't think that this signifies any kind of weakness throughout the economy, in fact the reverse. The job numbers I think are probably the best indicator that the economy is very strong and in really good shape.

Lazear doesn't want "to speculate" on when the housing market will bottom out, but then says "now ... or another quarter or so". Lazear has been consistently surprised by the housing bust, and my guess is he will be surprised some more! But on the last point, job numbers do tell us the economy is decent right now, but they tell us nothing about the future.

Question: And the risk of recession, do you have a --

CHAIRMAN LAZEAR: Well, again the economy is growing. I don't even think we should be talking about going in the other direction at this point. The economy is growing. The economy is strong. The labor market is strong. You know, you see -- when you see jobs added at this rate, when you see unemployment at 4.4 percent, it's pretty hard to be thinking about things going in the other direction. I mean obviously at some time in the future things can change, but right now, as long as we keep our policies consistent with economic growth, which means keep taxes low, make sure that we don't put impediments, strong impediments to trade and business in there, I think we're on track for a strong economy.

What can I say? Oh, Lazear also revised down the White House estimates for GDP growth for Q4 and 2007.

by Calculated Risk on 11/21/2006 12:51:00 PM

Click on graph for larger image.

The Treasury Department reports that interest on the National Debt was $405.9 Billion for fiscal 2006. The fiscal 2006 interest payment is an all time nominal record.

However, as a percent of GDP, interest on the National Debt is rising, but still low compared to the previous couple of decades. This is because the effective interest rate is very low compared to previous periods, even though the National Debt is increasing rapidly.

For October 2006 (first month of fiscal 2007), interest payments were $22.3 Billion compared to $18.8 Billion for October 2005.

As a rough estimate, interest payments will probably be in the $440 Billion to $460 Billion range for fiscal 2007. I'll work up a better estimate soon. Last November, I projected interest payments of $411 Billion for fiscal 2006.