by Calculated Risk on 1/23/2009 09:21:00 PM

From the FDIC:

1st Centennial Bank, Redlands, California, was closed today by the California Department of Financial Institutions, which then appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with First California Bank, Westlake Village, California, to assume the insured deposits of 1st Centennial.
...
As of January 9, 2009, 1st Centennial had total assets of $803.3 million and total deposits of $676.9 million, of which there were approximately $12.8 million that exceeded the insurance limits. ...

1st Centennial also had approximately $362 million in brokered deposits that are not part of today's transaction. ...

First California agreed to assume the insured deposits for a 5.29% premium. It will also purchase approximately $293 million of the failed bank's assets. The assets are comprised mainly of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. The FDIC will retain the remaining assets for later disposition.

The cost to the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund is estimated to be $227 million. 1st Centennial is the third bank to fail this year, and the first in California since Downey Savings and Loan, F.A., Newport Beach, was closed on November 21, 2008.

It is officially Friday.

by Calculated Risk on 1/23/2009 05:35:00 PM

From Bloomberg: Citigroup Raises $12 Billion in Largest FDIC-Backed Bond Sale (hat tip stockdog42)

Citigroup Inc. sold $12 billion of notes guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. ... The sale is the biggest offering of debt backed by the FDIC since banks began using the government’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program on Nov. 25

From Freddie Mac 8-K SEC filing (hat tip Comrade Byzantine_Ruins):

Freddie Mac (formally known as the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) is in the process of preparing its financial statements for the fourth quarter of 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2008. Based on preliminary unaudited information concerning its results for these periods, management currently estimates that the Federal Housing Finance Agency, in its capacity as conservator of Freddie Mac (Conservator), will submit a request to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) to draw an additional amount of approximately $30 billion to $35 billion under the $100 billion Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (Purchase Agreement) between Freddie Mac and Treasury. The actual amount of the draw may differ materially from this estimate as Freddie Mac goes through its internal and external process for preparing and finalizing its financial statements.

See previous post for some comedy relief: "I Want some TARP".

by Calculated Risk on 1/23/2009 05:08:00 PM

Enjoy ...

by Calculated Risk on 1/23/2009 04:20:00 PM

I've joked about "accidental landlords" before, and how these owners are just more shadow housing inventory.

Here is a UK story from the Financial Times: ‘Accidental landlords’ face shrinking rents

Letting agents saw a rush of so-called “accidental landlords” into the market last year, as falling house prices convinced property vendors to delay their sales. But the sheer volume of properties that have become available to potential tenants in recent months has brought stiff competition for landlords and put pressure on rents.
...
Many landlords have had to slash rents by around 20 per cent, according to agents. In the most oversupplied parts of London, falls in rental income have been as sharp as 30 per cent.

Ouch.

In the U.S. if an owner decides to rent, the mortgage rate doesn't change (although many areas have a property tax exemption for homeowners that no longer applies). But in the UK:

Homeowners who let their property are obliged to tell their lender and may have to move on to a more expensive buy-to-let mortgage.

Falling rents, more vacancies, and a higher mortgage payment - and falling property values - the joys of the accidental landlord. They probably would have been better off just selling at a loss.

by Calculated Risk on 1/23/2009 02:57:00 PM

From CNNMoney: Flood of foreclosures: It's worse than you think (hat tip Larry)

There is probably even more excess housing inventory gumming up the market than current statistics indicate, thanks to a wave of foreclosures that has yet to hit the market.
...
The problem: Many foreclosed homes and other distressed properties that are now owned by banks have yet to be listed for sale.
...
RealtyTrac looked at listings in four states, California, Maryland, Florida and Wisconsin, and found that they contained only a third of the foreclosures it has in its database.

Usually most REOs (lender Real Estate Owned) are listed pretty quickly, although lenders typically clean up the properties and sometimes do minor repairs before listing the property, so there is some lag between foreclosure and the property being listed. The size of this "ghost inventory" is unknown.

I've also heard a number stories of lenders delaying foreclosures, probably because they are overwhelmed right now. This is another type of potential "ghost inventory", although many of these properties might already be listed as short sales by the owner.

There is also a substantial shadow inventory – homeowners wanting to sell, but waiting for a better market - so for all these reasons, existing home inventory levels will probably stay elevated for some time.

by Calculated Risk on 1/23/2009 11:17:00 AM

From The Times: It's official - Britain is in recession

Britain is in the grip of its sharpest recession for three decades, grim official figures confirmed today ... The economy suffered a brutal 1.5 per cent drop in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) during the past three months, shrinking at its fastest quarterly pace since 1980.

Coming on the heels of an already steep 0.6 per cent plunge in GDP in the third quarter of last year, the news means that the widely accepted definition of recession as two consecutive quarters of falling output has finally been met.

This brings up a couple of interesting points:

For an "official" recession in Britain they use the "two consecutive quarters of declining GDP" rule. In the U.S., a recession is declared by NBER based on a number of factors:

A recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in production, employment, real income, and other indicators.

GDP is reported very differently in different countries. In the U.S. the headline number is the real (inflation adjusted) quarterly change, seasonally adjusted at an annual rate (SAAR). In Britain and the EU, the headline GDP number is the real quarterly change, but it is not the annual rate. So a 1.5% decline in the U.K. is about the same as a 6% decline (SAAR) in the U.S.

China reports the year-over-year change in real GDP for the quarter, so the 6.8% GDP for Q4 recently reported includes the changes in Q1 through Q3 too. As Roubini noted:

The Chinese came out today with their 6.8% estimate of Q4 2008 growth. China publishes its quarterly GDP figure on a year over year basis, differently from the U.S. and most other countries that publish their GDP growth figure on a quarter on quarter annualized seasonally adjusted (SAAR) basis.

When growth is slowing down sharply the Chinese way to measure GDP is highly misleading as quarter on quarter growth may be negative while the year over year figure is positive and high because of the momentum of the previous quarters’ positive growth.

Indeed if one were to convert the 6.8% y-o-y figure in the more standard quarter over quarter annualized figure Chinese growth in Q4 would be close to zero if not negative.

Here is the Britain report: UK output decreased by 1.5% in Q4 2008

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) contracted by 1.5 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2008, compared with a decrease of 0.6 per cent in the third quarter. The increased rate of decline in output was due to weaker services and production industries output.

Construction output decreased by 1.1 per cent, compared with a decrease of 0.2 per cent in the previous quarter.

by Calculated Risk on 1/23/2009 10:36:00 AM

From the WSJ: General Electric's Net Slides 44%.

Here are a couple of slides from their investor presentation:

Click on table for larger image in new window.

The credit loss estimate is $2 trillion - just a little lower than my estimate of $2 to $2.5 trillion (Roubini's estimate is $3.6 trillion now!)

The good news is a "broad deflationary cycle" begins!


Look at mortgage delinquencies: 10.74%!

And commercial delinquencies are rising faster too.

by Calculated Risk on 1/23/2009 02:44:00 AM

As I've noted several times most regional banks avoided the residential real estate market (because they couldn't compete) and instead focused on CRE and C&D (construction & development) lending. This exposed many regional banks to excessive CRE and C&D loan concentrations, and now that CRE will implode in 2009, many of these banks will be in serious jeopardy.

Eric Dash at the NY Times has some details: Smaller Banks’ Losses Expected to Bring Mergers

Most of these banks were never big players in credit cards, subprime mortgages or credit-default swaps. But they were major lenders to commercial real estate developers, home builders and small corporations. As the recession tightens, losses have started to surge.

“There will not be the shock and awe factor” of the big bank losses, said Nancy A. Bush, a longtime banking analyst. But “small and midsize banks are up to their eyeballs in commercial real estate related to residential development and business loans. We are going to see a reckoning with how bad that got” in 2009.
...
Gerard Cassidy, a veteran banking analyst, projected that 200 to 300 small banks might fail or be forced into mergers over the next year or so. While that is still a fraction of the industry’s 8,400 banks, it is up sharply from the 25 bank failures in 2008.

Sounds like Bank Failure Fridays will be busy this year.

by Calculated Risk on 1/22/2009 10:44:00 PM

From the Financial Times: Great Portland says demand for offices falls

Great Portland Estates, the London office developer, has reported a rise in vacancies and fall in rents as demand dries up for office space in its core West End property portfolio.
...
The company reported a clear deterioration in its occupier market. Rental value declined by 9.4 per cent overall, with a fall of 13.8 per cent in West End offices and 2.1 per cent in West End retail.
...
The void rate across its portfolio more than doubled to 7.5 per cent, from 3.2 in September, although the increase mainly reflects forward development planning rather than tenant failures.

As the economy weakens (the British economy will probably be officially in recession tomorrow), the vacancy rate will probably also be impacted by tenant failures (negative absorption).

by Calculated Risk on 1/22/2009 08:27:00 PM

From the Capital One conference call, on Closed End Unsecured Loans (hat tip Brian):

Analyst: When you look at the closed in loans that are clearly under performing at this stage, what is it about either the underwriting or the characteristics of that group of loans which makes that different than say a normal revolving credit card or what would you suppose is maybe leading to the worse than expected performance at this point?

COF CEO: There are several factors involving the closed in loans. From a credit point of view, closed end loans tend to attract, just sort of by the nature of who the customer base that pursues an installment loan, tends to attract a customer base that is a little more credit intense if you will relative to the broad swath of our credit card base because a credit card of course is also a transactional product as well as a borrowing product. These closed in loans in fact were to pretty darn strikingly high FICO customers, basically super prime customers by profile, but they certainly have a degraded a lot more quickly than the overall super prime sort of equivalent super prime credit card customer. You know, they tend to be -- a couple of things about the boom and bust market that we have seen both they tend to perform -- they are performing worse in the boom and bust market we can see that than the credit cards, and they have a higher concentration in boom and bust markets as well. ...
emphasis added

Those darn strikingly high FICO super prime borrowers!