by Calculated Risk on 8/28/2014 11:16:00 AM
Thursday, August 28, 2014
FDIC: Earnings increased for insured institutions, Fewer Problem banks, Residential REO Declines in Q2
The FDIC released the Quarterly Banking Profile for Q2 today.
Commercial banks and savings institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) reported aggregate net income of $40.2 billion in the second quarter of 2014, up $2.0 billion (5.3 percent) from earnings of $38.2 billion the industry reported a year earlier. The increase in earnings was mainly attributable to a $1.9 billion (22.4 percent) decline in loan-loss provisions and a $1.5 billion (1.4 percent) decline in noninterest expenses. Also, strong loan growth contributed to an increase in net interest income compared to a year ago. However, lower income from reduced mortgage activity and a drop in trading revenue contributed to a year-over-year decline in noninterest income.The FDIC reported the number of problem banks declined:
...
"We saw further improvement in the banking industry during the second quarter," FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg said. "Net income was up, asset quality improved, loan balances grew at their fastest pace since 2007, and loan growth was broad-based across institutions and loan types. We also saw a large decline in the number of problem banks. However, challenges remain. Industry revenue has been under pressure from narrow net interest margins and lower mortgage-related income. Institutions have been extending asset maturities, which is raising concerns about interest-rate risk. And banks have been increasing higher-risk loans to leveraged commercial borrowers. These issues are matters of ongoing supervisory attention. Nonetheless, on balance, results from the second quarter reflect a stronger banking industry and stronger community banks."
emphasis added
he number of "problem banks" fell for the 13th consecutive quarter. The number of banks on the FDIC's "Problem List" declined from 411 to 354 during the quarter. The number of "problem" banks now is 60 percent below the post-crisis high of 888 at the end of the first quarter of 2011. Seven FDIC-insured institutions failed in the second quarter, compared to 12 in the second quarter of 2013.Click on graph for larger image.
The dollar value of 1-4 family residential Real Estate Owned (REOs, foreclosure houses) declined from $6.57 billion in Q1 2014 to $6.22 billion in Q2. This is the lowest level of REOs since Q3 2007. Even in good times, the FDIC insured institutions have about $2.5 billion in residential REO.
This graph shows the dollar value of Residential REO for FDIC insured institutions. Note: The FDIC reports the dollar value and not the total number of REOs.
NAR: Pending Home Sales Index increased 3.3% in July, down 2.1% year-over-year
by Calculated Risk on 8/28/2014 10:03:00 AM
From the NAR: Pending Home Sales Pick Up in July
The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contract signings, climbed 3.3 percent to 105.9 in July from 102.5 in June, but is still 2.1 percent below July 2013 (108.2). The index is at its highest level since August 2013 (107.1) and is above 100 – considered an average level of contract activity – for the third consecutive month.Note: Contract signings usually lead sales by about 45 to 60 days, so this would usually be for closed sales in August and September.
...
The PHSI in the Northeast jumped 6.2 percent to 89.2 in July, and is 8.3 percent above a year ago. In the Midwest the index marginally fell 0.4 percent to 104.6 in July, and is 6.4 percent below July 2013.
Pending home sales in the South increased 4.2 percent to an index of 119.0 in July, and is now 1.0 percent below a year ago. The index in the West rose 4.0 percent in July to 99.5, but remains 6.0 percent below July 2013.
Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims decrease to 298,000
by Calculated Risk on 8/28/2014 08:33:00 AM
The DOL reports:
In the week ending August 23, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 298,000, a decrease of 1,000 from the previous week's revised level. The previous week's level was revised up by 1,000 from 298,000 to 299,000. The 4-week moving average was 299,750, a decrease of 1,250 from the previous week's revised average. The previous week's average was revised up by 250 from 300,750 to 301,000.The previous week was revised up to 299,000.
There were no special factors impacting this week's initial claims.
The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 1971.
Click on graph for larger image.
The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased to 299,750.
This was close to the consensus forecast of 300,000.
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
A comment from Tom Lawler on Household Estimates; Thursday: Unemployment Claims, Q2 GDP (2nd estimate), Pending Home Sales
by Calculated Risk on 8/27/2014 07:44:00 PM
CR Note: Many analysts and reporters use Census data to estimate ongoing household formation. They are ignoring severe problems with the Census estimates ... from housing economist Tom Lawler:
For well over a decade I have been trying to get Census to explain the widely different estimates of households from different surveys. In a 2004 "summit" that I hosted at Fannie Mae, I asked Census officials "what household number from a time series perspective should analysts use as the best estimate from Census?" The answer I got a decade a go was, "that's a good question." Read the attached.Thursday:
Household Estimates Conundrum: Effort to Develop More Consistent Household Estimates Across Surveys
And here is the conclusion section from the above.
We have an obligation to our data users to provide clear, unambiguous explanations and guidance about the estimates we provide on households (occupied housing units). In our role as the "leading source of quality data about the Nation’s people and economy," we ultimately should be able to:It's been a long slog ...
1. Develop a common methodology that produces reasonably consistent estimates of households (and, therefore, vacant housing units) across our current surveys,
2. Develop a common methodology that may still produce noticeable differences but still be able to explain differences and recommend a preferred estimate, or
3. Be able to explain why we cannot develop a common methodology and be able to explain the differences and provide guidance about the agency’s preferred estimate of households (occupied housing units) for the United States.
• At 8:30 AM ET, the initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for claims to increase to 300 thousand from 298 thousand.
• Also at 8:30 AM, Gross Domestic Product, 2nd quarter 2014 (second estimate). The consensus is that real GDP increased 4.0% annualized in Q2, unchanged from 4.0% in the advance estimate.
• At 10:00 AM, the Pending Home Sales Index for July. The consensus is for a 0.5% increase in the index.
• At 11:00 AM, the Kansas City Fed manufacturing survey for August. This is the last of the Fed regional surveys for August.
Average 30 Year Fixed Mortgage Rates decline to 4.11%, No "Refi Boom" in Sight
by Calculated Risk on 8/27/2014 04:27:00 PM
I use the weekly Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®) to track mortgage rates. The PMMS series started in 1971, so there is a fairly long historical series.
For daily rates, the Mortgage News Daily has a series that tracks the PMMS very well, and is usually updated daily around 4 PM ET. The MND data is based on actual lender rate sheets, and is mostly "the average no-point, no-origination rate for top-tier borrowers with flawless scenarios". (this tracks the Freddie Mac series).
MND reports that average 30 Year fixed mortgage rates declined today to 4.11% from 4.13% yesterday.
One year ago rates were at 4.61%, so rates are down 50 bps year-over-year.
I've mentioned before that mortgage refinancing tends to pickup when mortgage rates drop by about 50 bps from the recent levels. However rates were only at or above 4.60% for a short period - and many homeowners refi'd when rates were below 4% in 2012 and 2013. So I don't expect a "refi boom" right now.
Here is a table from Mortgage News Daily:
Freddie Mac: Mortgage Serious Delinquency rate declined in July, Lowest since January 2009
by Calculated Risk on 8/27/2014 12:36:00 PM
Freddie Mac reported that the Single-Family serious delinquency rate declined in July to 2.02% from 2.07% in June. Freddie's rate is down from 2.70% in July 2013, and this is the lowest level since January 2009. Freddie's serious delinquency rate peaked in February 2010 at 4.20%.
These are mortgage loans that are "three monthly payments or more past due or in foreclosure".
Note: Fannie Mae will report their Single-Family Serious Delinquency rate for July in a few days.
Click on graph for larger image
Although this indicates progress, the "normal" serious delinquency rate is under 1%.
The serious delinquency rate has fallen 0.68 percentage points over the last year - and at that rate of improvement, the serious delinquency rate will not be below 1% until early 2016.
Note: Very few seriously delinquent loans cure with the owner making up back payments - most of the reduction in the serious delinquency rate is from foreclosures, short sales, and modifications.
So even though distressed sales are declining, I expect an above normal level of Fannie and Freddie distressed sales for perhaps 2 more years (mostly in judicial foreclosure states).
CBO Projection: Budget Deficits in Future Years to be Smaller than Previous Forecast
by Calculated Risk on 8/27/2014 10:25:00 AM
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released new budget projections today An Update to the Budget and Economic Outlook: 2014 to 2024. The projected budget deficits have been reduced for most of the next ten years, although the projected deficit for 2014 has been revised up slightly (by $14 billion).
NOTE: In the previous update, the CBO revised down their projection of the deficit for fiscal 2014 from 3.7% to just under 2.9% of GDP.
From the CBO:
The federal budget deficit for fiscal year 2014 will amount to $506 billion, CBO estimates, roughly $170 billion lower than the shortfall recorded in 2013. At 2.9 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), this year's deficit will be much smaller than those of recent years (which reached almost 10 percent of GDP in 2009) and slightly below the average of federal deficits over the past 40 years.The CBO projects the deficit will decline further in 2015, and will be at or below 3% of GDP through fiscal 2019. Then the deficit will slowly increase.
...
CBO's current economic projections differ in some respects from the ones issued in February 2014. The agency has significantly lowered its projection of growth in real GDP for 2014, reflecting surprising economic weakness in the first half of the year. However, the level of real GDP over most of the coming decade is projected to be only modestly lower than estimated in February. In addition, CBO now anticipates lower interest rates throughout the projection period and a lower unemployment rate for the next six years.
emphasis added
Click on graph for larger image.
This graph shows the actual (purple) budget deficit each year as a percent of GDP, and an estimate for the next ten years based on estimates from the CBO.
The CBO revised down their deficit projections for fiscal years 2017 through 2024.
MBA: Mortgage Applications Increase in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
by Calculated Risk on 8/27/2014 07:01:00 AM
From the MBA: Mortgage Applications Increase in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
Mortgage applications increased 2.8 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending August 22, 2014. ...Click on graph for larger image.
The Refinance Index increased 3 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 3 percent from one week earlier. ...
...
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,000 or less) decreased to 4.28 percent from 4.29 percent, with points decreasing to 0.25 from 0.26 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) loans.
emphasis added
The first graph shows the refinance index.
The refinance index is down 73% from the levels in May 2013.
As expected, refinance activity is very low this year.
The second graph shows the MBA mortgage purchase index.
According to the MBA, the unadjusted purchase index is down about 11% from a year ago.
Tuesday, August 26, 2014
Zillow: Case-Shiller House Price Index expected to slow further year-over-year in July
by Calculated Risk on 8/26/2014 08:31:00 PM
The Case-Shiller house price indexes for June were released this morning. Zillow has started forecasting Case-Shiller a month early - and I like to check the Zillow forecasts since they have been pretty close.
From Zillow: Case-Shiller Slowdown Forecasted to Continue
The Case-Shiller data for June 2014 came out this morning, and based on this information and the July 2014 Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI, released August 21), we predict that next month’s Case-Shiller data (July 2014) will show that the non-seasonally adjusted (NSA) 20-City Composite Home Price Index increased by 7.0 percent and the NSA 10-City Composite Home Price Index increased by 6.9 percent on a year-over-year basis. The seasonally adjusted (SA) month-over-month change from June to July will be 0.1 percent for the 20-City Composite Index and flat for the 10-City Composite Home Price Index (SA). All forecasts are shown in the table below. Officially, the Case-Shiller Composite Home Price Indices for July will not be released until Tuesday, September 30.So the Case-Shiller index will probably show a lower year-over-year gain in July than in June (8.1% year-over-year).
Zillow July 2014 Forecast for Case-Shiller Index | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case Shiller Composite 10 | Case Shiller Composite 20 | ||||
NSA | SA | NSA | SA | ||
Case Shiller (year ago) | July 2013 | 176.39 | 172.88 | 162.38 | 158.96 |
Case-Shiller (last month) | June 2014 | 187.19 | 185.57 | 172.33 | 170.69 |
Zillow Forecast | YoY | 6.9% | 6.9% | 7.0% | 7.0% |
MoM | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.1% | |
Zillow Forecasts1 | 188.5 | 185.2 | 173.7 | 170.5 | |
Current Post Bubble Low | 146.45 | 149.91 | 134.07 | 137.13 | |
Date of Post Bubble Low | Mar-12 | Jan-12 | Mar-12 | Jan-12 | |
Above Post Bubble Low | 28.7% | 23.5% | 29.6% | 24.3% | |
1Estimate based on Year-over-year and Month-over-month Zillow forecasts |
A few comments on the Seasonal Pattern for House Prices
by Calculated Risk on 8/26/2014 04:45:00 PM
• Starting this month, S&P is releasing the Case-Shiller National Index on a monthly basis. This probably means most reporting of a "headline number" will be switched from the Case-Shiller Composite 20 to the National Index.
• On a method to improve the seasonal factors, see Trulia chief economist Jed Kolko's article "Let’s Improve, Not Ignore, Seasonal Adjustment of Housing Data"
There has always been a clear seasonal pattern for house prices, but the seasonal differences have been more pronounced since the housing bust.
Even in normal times house prices tend to be stronger in the spring and early summer than in the fall and winter. Recently there has been a larger than normal seasonal pattern mostly because conventional sales are following the normal pattern (more sales in the spring and summer), but distressed sales (foreclosures and short sales) happen all year. So distressed sales have had a larger negative impact on prices in the fall and winter.
Note: I was one of several people to question the change in the seasonal factor (here is a post in 2009) - and this led to S&P Case-Shiller questioning the seasonal factor too (from April 2010).
Click on graph for larger image.
This graph shows the month-to-month change in the CoreLogic and NSA Case-Shiller National index since 1987 (both through Jnue). The seasonal pattern was smaller back in the '90s and early '00s, and increased since the bubble burst.
It appears we've already seen the strongest month this year (NSA) for both Case-Shiller NSA and CoreLogic. This suggests both indexes will turn negative seasonally (NSA) earlier this year than the previous two years - perhaps in the August reports.
The second graph shows the seasonal factors for the Case-Shiller National index since 1987. The factors started to change near the peak of the bubble, and really increased during the bust.
It appears the seasonal factor has started to decrease, and I expect that over the next several years - as the percent of distressed sales declines further and recent history is included in the factors - the seasonal factors will move back towards more normal levels (Kolko's article has more on this).