by Calculated Risk on 1/08/2018 12:34:00 PM
Monday, January 08, 2018
Prime Working-Age Population nears 2007 Peak
Update through December: The prime working age population peaked in 2007, and bottomed at the end of 2012. As of December 2017, according to the BLS, there were still fewer people in the 25 to 54 age group than in 2007.
Changes in demographics are an important determinant of economic growth, and although most people focus on the aging of the "baby boomer" generation, the movement of younger cohorts into the prime working age is another key story. Here is a graph of the prime working age population (25 to 54 years old) from 1948 through December 2017.
Note: This is population, not work force.
Click on graph for larger image.
There was a huge surge in the prime working age population in the '70s, '80s and '90s.
The prime working age labor force grew even quicker than the population in the '70s and '80s due to the increase in participation of women. In fact, the prime working age labor force was increasing 3%+ per year in the '80s!
So when we compare economic growth to the '70s, '80, or 90's we have to remember this difference in demographics (the '60s saw solid economic growth as near-prime age groups increased sharply).
The good news is the prime working age group should start growing at 0.5% per year - and this should boost economic activity.
Note: Demographics impact the unemployment rate and also appear to impact inflation. That is why I look back to the mid-60s - when the prime age population was growing slowly - to compare somewhat to today. In the '60s, the unemployment rate bottomed at 3.4% (we could see something close to that again), and inflation was below 2% for the first half of the decade. The large cohort currently moving into the prime working age is larger than the baby boom in absolute numbers, but not close as a percentage of the population. So any demographic impact on the unemployment rate and inflation going forward should be much less than in the '70s.
Update: Framing Lumber Prices Up Sharply Year-over-year
by Calculated Risk on 1/08/2018 10:06:00 AM
Here is another update on framing lumber prices. Early in 2013 lumber prices came close to the housing bubble highs - and prices are once again near the bubble highs.
This graph shows two measures of lumber prices: 1) Framing Lumber from Random Lengths through November 2017 (via NAHB), and 2) CME framing futures.
Prices in early 2018 are up solidly year-over-year and might exceed the housing bubble highs in the Spring of 2018. Note: CME prices hit an all time high briefly in November.
Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.
Right now Random Lengths prices are up 22% from a year ago, and CME futures are up about 46% year-over-year.
There is a seasonal pattern for lumber prices. Prices frequently peak around May, and bottom around October or November - although there is quite a bit of seasonal variability.
It looks like we will see record prices this year.
Sunday, January 07, 2018
Sunday Night Futures
by Calculated Risk on 1/07/2018 08:00:00 PM
Weekend:
• Schedule for Week of Jan 7, 2018
Monday:
• 3:00 PM ET, Consumer Credit from the Federal Reserve. The consensus is for consumer credit to increase $18.0 billion in November.
From CNBC: Pre-Market Data and Bloomberg futures: S&P 500 are up 2, and DOW futures are up 67 (fair value).
Oil prices were up over the last week with WTI futures at $61.57 per barrel and Brent at $67.72 per barrel. A year ago, WTI was at $54, and Brent was at $56 - so oil prices are up solidly year-over-year.
Here is a graph from Gasbuddy.com for nationwide gasoline prices. Nationally prices are at $2.49 per gallon. A year ago prices were at $2.38 per gallon - so gasoline prices are up 11 cents per gallon year-over-year.
Oil Rigs "Total US oil rigs were down 5 to 742 this week"
by Calculated Risk on 1/07/2018 11:32:00 AM
A few comments from Steven Kopits of Princeton Energy Advisors LLC on Jan 5, 2017:
• Total US oil rigs were down 5 to 742 this weekClick on graph for larger image.
• Horizontal oil rigs declined again, -2 to 650
• The reticence of operators to add rigs in the face of surging oil prices is remarkable. It suggests we are seeing a second inflection point with even greater restraint from operators. (The first inflection point for this cycle occurred in July.)br />
• Oil price bears will find no comfort in this report. Expect oil prices to continue to rise until we see life in the horizontal rig count.
...
• Incredible price action again this week, with WTI breaching the $62 threshold, and the Brent spread holding around $6.50.
CR note: This graph shows the US horizontal rig count by basin.
Graph and comments Courtesy of Steven Kopits of Princeton Energy Advisors LLC.
Saturday, January 06, 2018
Schedule for Week of January 7, 2018
by Calculated Risk on 1/06/2018 08:01:00 AM
The key economic reports this week are December retail sales and the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
3:00 PM: Consumer Credit from the Federal Reserve. The consensus is for consumer credit to increase $18.0 billion in November.
6:00 AM ET: NFIB Small Business Optimism Index for December.
10:00 AM ET: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey for November from the BLS.
This graph shows job openings (yellow line), hires (purple), Layoff, Discharges and other (red column), and Quits (light blue column) from the JOLTS.
Jobs openings decreased in October to 5.996 million from 6.177 in September.
The number of job openings (yellow) were up 7.3% year-over-year, and Quits were up 3.3% year-over-year.
7:00 AM ET: The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the results for the mortgage purchase applications index.
8:30 AM: The initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for 245 thousand initial claims, down from 250 thousand the previous week.
8:30 AM: The Producer Price Index for December from the BLS. The consensus is a 0.2% increase in PPI, and a 0.2% increase in core PPI.
8:30 AM ET: Retail sales for December will be released. The consensus is for a 0.5% increase in retail sales.
This graph shows the year-over-year change in retail sales and food service (ex-gasoline) since 1993. Retail and Food service sales, ex-gasoline, increased by 5.0% on a YoY basis in November.
8:30 AM: The Consumer Price Index for December from the BLS. The consensus is for a 0.1% increase in CPI, and a 0.2% increase in core CPI.
10:00 AM: Manufacturing and Trade: Inventories and Sales (business inventories) report for November. The consensus is for a 0.3% increase in inventories.
Friday, January 05, 2018
Q4 GDP Forecasts
by Calculated Risk on 1/05/2018 07:25:00 PM
From Merrill Lynch:
Core capital goods shipments and orders were revised down in November. The trade deficit widened more than expected. These data sliced 0.2pp from 4Q GDP tracking, bringing us down to 2.3%.From the Altanta Fed: GDPNow
emphasis added
The GDPNow model forecast for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the fourth quarter of 2017 is 2.7 percent on January 5, down from 3.2 percent on January 3.From the NY Fed Nowcasting Report
The New York Fed Staff Nowcast stands at 4.0% for 2017:Q4 and 3.4% for 2018:Q1.CR Note: This is a wide range of forecasts (from 2.3% to 4.0%).
Looking back at the October forecasts for Q3, Merrill was 3.0%, the Atlanta Fed at 2.7% and the NY Fed at 1.5% (the BEA reported 3.0% before revisions).
For Q2, the July forecasts were Merrill at 2.1%, the Atlanta Fed at 2.5%, and the NY Fed at 2.0% (the BEA initially reported 2.6%).
AAR: Rail Carloads increased, "Best Year Ever" for Intermodal
by Calculated Risk on 1/05/2018 05:10:00 PM
From the Association of American Railroads (AAR) Rail Time Indicators. Graphs and excerpts reprinted with permission.
Rail traffic ended 2017 on a positive note. Total U.S. rail carloads in December 2017 were up 2.5% (24,606 carloads) over December 2016, their first year-over-year monthly increase in six months, thanks largely to gains in carloads of crushed stone, sand, and gravel; metallic ores; and chemicals. ... For all of 2017, total carloads were up 2.9%, or 381,266 carloads ... Meanwhile, U.S. intermodal traffic was up 5.3% (53,990 units) in December 2017 over December 2016 and up 3.9% (521,121 units) in 2017 over 2016. 2017 was the best year ever for U.S. intermodal volume.Click on graph for larger image.
This graph from the Rail Time Indicators report shows U.S. average weekly rail carloads (NSA). Dark blue is 2017.
Rail carloads have been weak over the last decade due to the decline in coal shipments.
U.S. railroads originated 998,168 carloads in December 2017, up 2.5% (24,606 carloads) over December 2016. It’s the first year-over-year monthly increase for total carloads in six months. Total carloads averaged 249,542 per week in December 2017. Since 1988, when our data begin, only 2009, 2014, and 2015 had fewer weekly average carloads in December than December 2017 did. Still, you take what you can get; the carload increase in December was certainly welcome.The second graph is for intermodal traffic (using intermodal or shipping containers):
2017 was the best year ever for U.S. intermodal. Originations for the year were 14.01 million containers and trailers, up 3.9%, or 521,121 units, over 2016 and up 2.2%, or 301,172 units, over 2015’s previous record of 13.71 million units. In December, intermodal volume was 1.07 million units, up 5.3%, or 53,980 units, over December 2016. In 2017, containers accounted for 91.0% of U.S. intermodal units, down slightly from 2016’s 91.3%. Eleven of the top 12 U.S. intermodal weeks in history were in 2017.
Public and Private Sector Payroll Jobs During Presidential Terms
by Calculated Risk on 1/05/2018 02:50:00 PM
Here is another update of tracking employment during Presidential terms. We frequently use Presidential terms as time markers - we could use Speaker of the House, Fed Chair, or any other marker.
NOTE: Several readers have asked if I could add a lag to these graphs (obviously a new President has zero impact on employment for the month they are elected). But that would open a debate on the proper length of the lag, so I'll just stick to the beginning of each term.
Important: There are many differences between these periods. Overall employment was smaller in the '80s, however the participation rate was increasing in the '80s (younger population and women joining the labor force), and the participation rate is generally declining now. But these graphs give an overview of employment changes.
The first graph shows the change in private sector payroll jobs from when each president took office until the end of their term(s). Presidents Carter and George H.W. Bush only served one term.
Mr. G.W. Bush (red) took office following the bursting of the stock market bubble, and left during the bursting of the housing bubble. Mr. Obama (dark blue) took office during the financial crisis and great recession. There was also a significant recession in the early '80s right after Mr. Reagan (dark red) took office.
There was a recession towards the end of President G.H.W. Bush (light purple) term, and Mr Clinton (light blue) served for eight years without a recession.
Click on graph for larger image.
The first graph is for private employment only.
Mr. Trump is in Orange (just eleven months).
The employment recovery during Mr. G.W. Bush's (red) first term was sluggish, and private employment was down 811,000 jobs at the end of his first term. At the end of Mr. Bush's second term, private employment was collapsing, and there were net 396,000 private sector jobs lost during Mr. Bush's two terms.
Private sector employment increased by 20,966,000 under President Clinton (light blue), by 14,717,000 under President Reagan (dark red), 9,041,000 under President Carter (dashed green), 1,510,000 under President G.H.W. Bush (light purple), and 11,756,000 under President Obama (dark blue).
During the first eleven months of Mr. Trump's term, the economy has added 1,809,000 private sector jobs.
A big difference between the presidencies has been public sector employment. Note the bumps in public sector employment due to the decennial Census in 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010.
The public sector grew during Mr. Carter's term (up 1,304,000), during Mr. Reagan's terms (up 1,414,000), during Mr. G.H.W. Bush's term (up 1,127,000), during Mr. Clinton's terms (up 1,934,000), and during Mr. G.W. Bush's terms (up 1,744,000 jobs). However the public sector declined significantly while Mr. Obama was in office (down 268,000 jobs).
During the first eleven months of Mr. Trump's term, the economy has added 30,000 public sector jobs.
The third graph shows the progress towards the Trump goal of adding 10 million jobs over the next 4 years.
After eleven months of Mr. Trump's presidency, the economy has added 1,839,000 jobs, about 453,000 behind the projection.
Earlier: Trade Deficit at $50.5 Billion in November
by Calculated Risk on 1/05/2018 12:27:00 PM
From the Department of Commerce reported:
The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, through the Department of Commerce, announced today that the goods and services deficit was $50.5 billion in November, up $1.6 billion from $48.9 billion in October, revised. November exports were $200.2 billion, $4.4 billion more than October exports. November imports were $250.7 billion, $6.0 billion more than October imports.Click on graph for larger image.
Both exports and imports increased in November.
Exports are 12% above the pre-recession peak and up 8% compared to November 2016; imports are 8% above the pre-recession peak, and up 8% compared to November 2016.
Trade has been picking up.
The second graph shows the U.S. trade deficit, with and without petroleum.
The blue line is the total deficit, and the black line is the petroleum deficit, and the red line is the trade deficit ex-petroleum products.
Oil imports averaged $50.10 in October, up from $47.26 in November, and up from $40.81 in November 2016. The petroleum deficit had been declining for years (although the petroleum deficit has been steady for the last few years) this is the major reason the overall deficit has mostly moved sideways since early 2012.
The trade deficit with China increased to $35.4 billion in November, from $30.5 billion in November 2016.
ISM Non-Manufacturing Index decreased to 55.9% in December
by Calculated Risk on 1/05/2018 10:05:00 AM
The November ISM Non-manufacturing index was at 55.9%, down from 57.4% in November. The employment index increased in December to 56.3%, from 55.3%. Note: Above 50 indicates expansion, below 50 contraction.
From the Institute for Supply Management: December 2017 Non-Manufacturing ISM Report On Business®
Economic activity in the non-manufacturing sector grew in December for the 96th consecutive month, say the nation’s purchasing and supply executives in the latest Non-Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business®.Click on graph for larger image.
The report was issued today by Anthony Nieves, CPSM, C.P.M., A.P.P., CFPM, Chair of the Institute for Supply Management® (ISM®) Non-Manufacturing Business Survey Committee: "The NMI® registered 55.9 percent, which is 1.5 percentage points lower than the November reading of 57.4 percent. This represents continued growth in the non-manufacturing sector at a slower rate. The Non-Manufacturing Business Activity Index decreased to 57.3 percent, 4.1 percentage points lower than the November reading of 61.4 percent, reflecting growth for the 101st consecutive month, at a slower rate in December. The New Orders Index registered 54.3 percent, 4.4 percentage points lower than the reading of 58.7 percent in November. The Employment Index increased 1 percentage point in December to 56.3 percent from the November reading of 55.3 percent. The Prices Index increased by 0.1 percentage point from the November reading of 60.7 percent to 60.8 percent, indicating that prices increased in December for the seventh consecutive month. According to the NMI®, 14 non-manufacturing industries reported growth. There has been a second consecutive month of pullback in the rate of growth. Overall, the majority of respondents’ comments indicate that they finished the year on a positive note. They also indicate optimism for business conditions and the economic outlook going forward."
emphasis added
This graph shows the ISM non-manufacturing index (started in January 2008) and the ISM non-manufacturing employment diffusion index.
This suggests slower expansion in December than in November.