by Calculated Risk on 3/01/2020 08:27:00 PM

Note: As many experts expected, containment of COVID-19 has failed (but attempts at containment probably delayed the US epidemic giving policy makers crucial time to prepare).

Pay attention to the experts at the CDC about the virus (get a Flu shot, social distancing, hand washing, etc.). I'll stay focused on the economic data, and suggest some (non-medical) government policies that would help.

Weekend:
• Schedule for Week of March 1, 2020

Monday:
• At 10:00 AM ET, ISM Manufacturing Index for January. The consensus is for the ISM to be at 50.4, down from 50.9 in January.

• At 10:00 AM, Construction Spending for December. The consensus is for a 0.7% increase in construction spending.

From CNBC: Pre-Market Data and Bloomberg futures: S&P 500 are down 34 and DOW futures are down 260 (fair value).

Oil prices were down over the last week with WTI futures at $45.14 per barrel and Brent at $50.36 barrel.  A year ago, WTI was at $57, and Brent was at $65 - so oil prices are down 20% year-over-year.

Here is a graph from Gasbuddy.com for nationwide gasoline prices. Nationally prices are at $2.42 per gallon. A year ago prices were at $2.42 per gallon, so gasoline prices are unchanged year-over-year.

by Calculated Risk on 3/01/2020 01:07:00 PM

The FDIC's official problem bank list is comprised of banks with a CAMELS rating of 4 or 5, and the list is not made public (just the number of banks and assets every quarter). Note: Bank CAMELS ratings are also not made public.

CAMELS is the FDIC rating system, and stands for Capital adequacy, Asset quality, Management, Earnings, Liquidity and Sensitivity to market risk. The scale is from 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest.

As a substitute for the CAMELS ratings, surferdude808 is using publicly announced formal enforcement actions, and also media reports and company announcements that suggest to us an enforcement action is likely, to compile a list of possible problem banks in the public interest.

DISCLAIMER: This is an unofficial list, the information is from public sources and while deemed to be reliable is not guaranteed. No warranty or representation, expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy of the information contained herein and same is subject to errors and omissions. This is not intended as investment advice. Please contact CR with any errors.

Here is the unofficial problem bank list for February 2020.

Here are the monthly changes and a few comments from surferdude808:

Update on the Unofficial Problem Bank List for February 2020. During the month, the list declined by one to 63 banks after one removal. Aggregate assets fell to $48.5 billion from $51.3 billion a month ago with $2.6 billion of the decline coming from updated asset figures for the fourth quarter of 2019. A year ago, the list held 76 institutions with assets of $52.8 billion. Gwinnett Community Bank, Duluth, GA ($223 million) found its way off the list through a merger partner. This past week, the FDIC release industry results for the fourth quarter of 2019 and provide an update on the Official Problem Bank List, which they said had 51 institutions with assets of $48.8 billion. Earlier in the month on February 14, 2020, the Nebraska Department of Banking closed Ericson State Bank, Ericson, NE ($101 million). The FDIC estimated a 14% loss rate on the failure.

The first unofficial problem bank list was published in August 2009 with 389 institutions. The number of unofficial problem banks grew quickly and peaked at 1,003 institutions in July, 2011 - and has steadily declined since then to well below 100 institutions.

by Calculated Risk on 2/29/2020 08:11:00 AM

The key report scheduled for this week is the February employment report.

Other key reports scheduled for this week are the trade deficit and February vehicle sales.

----- Monday, Mar 2nd -----
10:00 AM: ISM Manufacturing Index for January. The consensus is for the ISM to be at 50.4, down from 50.9 in January.

Here is a long term graph of the ISM manufacturing index.

The PMI was at 50.9% in January, the employment index was at 46.4%, and the new orders index was at 52.0%.

10:00 AM: Construction Spending for December. The consensus is for a 0.7% increase in construction spending.

----- Tuesday, Mar 3rd -----
All day: Light vehicle sales for February. The consensus is for light vehicle sales to be 16.8 million SAAR in February, unchanged from 16.8 million in January (Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate).

This graph shows light vehicle sales since the BEA started keeping data in 1967. The dashed line is the January sales rate.

10:00 AM: Corelogic House Price index for January.

----- Wednesday, Mar 4th -----
7:00 AM ET: The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the results for the mortgage purchase applications index.

8:15 AM: The ADP Employment Report for February. This report is for private payrolls only (no government). The consensus is for 170,000 payroll jobs added in February, down from 291,000 added in January.

10:00 AM: the ISM non-Manufacturing Index for February.

2:00 PM: the Federal Reserve Beige Book, an informal review by the Federal Reserve Banks of current economic conditions in their Districts.

----- Thursday, Mar 5th -----
8:30 AM: The initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for 220 thousand initial claims, up from 219 thousand the previous week.

----- Friday, Mar 6th -----
8:30 AM: Employment Report for February.   The consensus is for 175,000 jobs added, and for the unemployment rate to be unchanged at 3.6%.

There were 225,000 jobs added in January, and the unemployment rate was at 3.6%.

This graph shows the year-over-year change in total non-farm employment since 1968.

In January, the year-over-year change was 2.052 million jobs.

8:30 AM: Trade Balance report for January from the Census Bureau.

This graph shows the U.S. trade deficit, with and without petroleum, through the most recent report. The blue line is the total deficit, and the black line is the petroleum deficit, and the red line is the trade deficit ex-petroleum products.

The consensus is the trade deficit to be $47.7 billion.  The U.S. trade deficit was at $48.9 billion in December.

3:00 PM: Consumer Credit from the Federal Reserve.

by Calculated Risk on 2/28/2020 04:27:00 PM

Fannie Mae reported that the Single-Family Serious Delinquency was unchanged at 0.66% in January, from 0.66% in December. The serious delinquency rate is down from 0.76% in January 2019.

These are mortgage loans that are "three monthly payments or more past due or in foreclosure". 

This matches the last two months as the lowest serious delinquency rate for Fannie Mae since June 2007.

The Fannie Mae serious delinquency rate peaked in February 2010 at 5.59%.

Click on graph for larger image

By vintage, for loans made in 2004 or earlier (2% of portfolio), 2.48% are seriously delinquent. For loans made in 2005 through 2008 (4% of portfolio), 4.08% are seriously delinquent, For recent loans, originated in 2009 through 2018 (94% of portfolio), only 0.35% are seriously delinquent. So Fannie is still working through a few poor performing loans from the bubble years.

I expect the serious delinquency rate will probably decline to 0.4 to 0.6 percent or so to a cycle bottom.

Note: Freddie Mac reported earlier.

by Calculated Risk on 2/28/2020 12:41:00 PM

Several readers have asked about the economic impact of the novel coronavirus. The answer is it depends on the severity of the epidemic.

Goldman Sachs economists wrote this morning:

Our new baseline scenario involves a continued slowdown in infections in China that allows for a slow recovery in high-frequency indicators of economic activity. However, it also includes moderate supply chain disruptions in the global goods-producing sector, as well as a hit to consumer spending and business activity from national outbreaks that go well beyond China and the other countries (such as Korea and Italy) that have been affected so far. Our analysis shows effects on quarter-on-quarter annualized global GDP growth of -5pp in Q1 and -2pp in Q2, followed by a rebound in the second half of 2020, leaving our full-year global growth forecast at about 2%. All else equal, this would imply a short-lived global contraction that stops short of an outright recession.
...
We also consider two alternative scenarios. The upside scenario assumes that the global spread of the virus is brought under control quickly and supply chain disruptions remain mostly absent; if so, global GDP would rebound in Q2, risk asset markets would recover sharply, and central banks may stay on hold. The downside scenario assumes widespread supply chain disruptions as well as domestic demand weakness across the global economy. This would involve sharp sequential contraction in global GDP in Q1 and Q2—i.e., a global recession—and probably an aggressive monetary easing campaign, including a return to the near-zero funds rate of the post-crisis period.

That is a wide range of outcomes. If the epidemic slows sharply (perhaps due to seasonality), then the economy should recover quickly. However, if the epidemic continues to spread rapidly, then we could be looking at a global recession (and an enormous human tragedy).

There will be an immediate impact on travel, and not just to Asia (we are starting to see slack in the US hotel occupancy rate). And there could be an impact on US consumer spending, especially on high priced items like cars and housing (although lower interest rates are a positive).   I expect areas like Las Vegas will be hit hard for the duration of the health crisis  (cancelled conventions or low attendance)

We need accurate information, especially on the number of daily tests - both positive and negative results - and advice from experts on how and when to alter our behavior (social-distancing, etc).   It is concerning that one of the first acts of VP Pence was to the muzzle the experts at the CDC and HHS.  This is reminiscent of what happened in 1918.

In 1918, at the beginning of the crisis, government officials tried to put a positive spin on the flu epidemic. From the Smithsonian magazine:

[W]hile influenza bled into American life, public health officials, determined to keep morale up, began to lie.

Early in September, a Navy ship from Boston carried influenza to Philadelphia, where the disease erupted in the Navy Yard. The city’s public health director, Wilmer Krusen, declared that he would “confine this disease to its present limits, and in this we are sure to be successful. No fatalities have been recorded. No concern whatever is felt.”

The next day two sailors died of influenza. Krusen stated they died of “old-fashioned influenza or grip,” not Spanish flu. Another health official declared, “From now on the disease will decrease.”

The next day 14 sailors died—and the first civilian. Each day the disease accelerated. Each day newspapers assured readers that influenza posed no danger. Krusen assured the city he would “nip the epidemic in the bud."

Right now the best data is from the CDC and the WHO.  I'll write more on the possible impact as more information becomes available.

by Calculated Risk on 2/28/2020 11:16:00 AM

From Merrill Lynch:

The data lifted 1Q GDP tracking by 0.4pp to 1.3% qoq saar. [Feb 28 estimate]
emphasis added

From Goldman Sachs:

We lowered our Q1 GDP tracking estimate by two tenths to +1.1% (qoq ar), reflecting a larger expected drag from inventories. [Feb 27 estimate]

From the NY Fed Nowcasting Report

The New York Fed Staff Nowcast stands at 2.1% for 2020:Q1. [Feb 28 estimate]

And from the Altanta Fed: GDPNow

The GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the first quarter of 2020 is 2.6 percent on February 28, down from 2.7 percent on February 27. [Feb 28 estimate]

CR Note: These early estimates suggest real GDP growth will be between 1.1% and 2.6% annualized in Q1.

by Calculated Risk on 2/28/2020 09:48:00 AM

From HotelNewsNow.com: STR: US hotel results for week ending 22 February

The U.S. hotel industry reported mostly negative year-over-year results in the three key performance metrics during the week of 16-22 February 2020, according to data from STR.

In comparison with the week of 17-23 February 2019, the industry recorded the following:

• Occupancy: -2.1% to 63.2%
• Average daily rate (ADR): +0.7% to US$130.55
• Revenue per available room (RevPAR): -1.4% to US$82.55

Of note, U.S. airport hotels reported a 4.8% decrease in occupancy for the week, which was the steepest decline among all location types tracked by STR. The decline was steeper in airport markets outside of the country’s 10 busiest.

“The obvious question is whether a dip in demand in airport hotels was directly connected to the coronavirus outbreak,” said Jan Freitag, STR’s senior VP of lodging insights. “However, one week of data is not sufficient for STR to make that correlation, especially considering last week was rather weak around the country in general—possibly due to extended vacations after Presidents’ Day.

“We’ve maintained that we do expect to see a coronavirus impact in U.S. hotel performance data, especially in gateway cities that have historically seen a large number of Chinese arrivals. We’ll continue to monitor the data each week. The next few weeks will be especially interesting considering the news to come out of the CDC on Tuesday.”
emphasis added

The following graph shows the seasonal pattern for the hotel occupancy rate using the four week average.

Click on graph for larger image.

The red line is for 2020, dash light blue is 2019, blue is the median, and black is for 2009 (the worst year probably since the Great Depression for hotels).

2020 is off to a decent start, however, STR notes that the new coronavirus could have a significant negative impact on hotels.

by Calculated Risk on 2/28/2020 08:35:00 AM

The BEA released the Personal Income and Outlays report for January:

Personal income increased $116.5 billion (0.6 percent) in January according to estimates released today by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Disposable personal income (DPI) increased $101.4 billion (0.6 percent) and personal consumption expenditures (PCE) increased $29.6 billion (0.2 percent).

Real DPI increased 0.5 percent in January and Real PCE increased 0.1 percent. The PCE price index increased 0.1 percent. Excluding food and energy, the PCE price index increased 0.1 percent.

The January PCE price index increased 1.7 percent year-over-year and the January PCE price index, excluding food and energy, increased 1.6 percent year-over-year.

The following graph shows real Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) through January 2020 (2012 dollars). Note that the y-axis doesn't start at zero to better show the change.

Click on graph for larger image.

The dashed red lines are the quarterly levels for real PCE.

The increase in personal income was above expectations,  and the increase in PCE was below expectations.

Note that core PCE inflation was below expectations.

by Calculated Risk on 2/27/2020 10:32:00 PM

Friday:
• At 8:30 AM ET, Personal Income and Outlays for January. The consensus is for a 0.3% increase in personal income, and for a 0.3% increase in personal spending. And for the Core PCE price index to increase 0.2%.

• At 9:45 AM, Chicago Purchasing Managers Index for February. The consensus is for a reading of 45.8, up from 42.9 in January.

• At 10:00 AM, University of Michigan's Consumer sentiment index (Final for February). The consensus is for a reading of 100.9.

by Calculated Risk on 2/27/2020 04:43:00 PM

Freddie Mac reported that the Single-Family serious delinquency rate in January was 0.60%, down from 0.63% in December. Freddie's rate is down from 0.70% in January 2019.

This the lowest delinquency rate since November 2007.

Freddie's serious delinquency rate peaked in February 2010 at 4.20%.

These are mortgage loans that are "three monthly payments or more past due or in foreclosure". 

Click on graph for larger image

I expect the delinquency rate to decline to a cycle bottom in the 0.4% to 0.6% range - so this is close to a bottom.

Note: Fannie Mae will report for January soon.