by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2021 04:35:00 PM

From housing economist Tom Lawler:

Based on publicly-available local realtor/MLS reports released across the country through today, I project that existing home sales as estimated by the National Association of Realtors ran at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 6.29 million in February, down 6.0% from January’s preliminary pace but up 10.4% from last February’s seasonally adjusted pace.

Local realtor reports, as well as reports from national inventory trackers, suggest that the YOY decline in the inventory of existing homes for sale last month was significantly larger than the big decline in January. The catalyst for the inventory drop in both months appears to have been very low levels of new listings – almost all realtor reports that include new listings showed a sizable YOY decline.

Finally, local realtor/MLS data suggest that the median existing single-family home sales price last month was up by about 14.5% from last February.

CR Note: The National Association of Realtors (NAR) is scheduled to release February existing home sales on Monday, March 22, 2021 at 10:00 AM ET. The consensus is for 6.51 million SAAR.

by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2021 03:04:00 PM

Note: I'm posting data for many local markets around the U.S. The story is the same everywhere ... inventory is at record lows.

From the Maryland Realtors for the entire state:

Closed sales in February 2021 were 6,209, up 12.3% from 5,527 in February 2020.

Active Listings in February 2021 were 6,245, down 65.6% from 18,179 in February 2020.

Months of Supply was 0.8 Months in February 2021, compared to 2.4 Months in February 2020.

by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2021 01:53:00 PM

Note: I'm posting data for many local markets around the U.S. The story is the same everywhere ... inventory is at record lows.

From the New Hampshire Realtors for the entire state:

Closed sales Single family and Condos in February 2021 were 1,217, up 13.5% from 1,072 in February 2020.

Active Listings Single family and Condos in February 2021 were 1,514, down 63.8% from 4,178 in February 2020.

Months of Supply for Single family and Condos in February 2021 was 0.7 months, down from 2.1 months in February 2020.

by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2021 12:40:00 PM

Note: I'm posting data for many local markets around the U.S. The story is the same just about everywhere ... inventory is at record lows.

From the MNRealtor Homes for sale down. Pending sales flat for first time since May 2020 for the entire state:

Demand remained high in the Minnesota housing market in February as homebuyers competed with multiple offers for diminishing housing stock. Closed sales were up +5.8% over last year, but new listings sank -14.8%. Since last May, pending sales fell flat for the first time and were down -0.8% from February 2020. Adding to the pressure, homes for sale fell 51.6%, the largest decrease in a year. Shrinking inventory defined this seller’s market, pushing the median sales price up +10.6% to $282,000. Days on the market retracted by -25.47% over last year, down to just 47 days. Correspondingly, homes received 99.0% of the original price received, a +2.3% increase over last year.
emphasis added

Closed sales in February 2021 were 4,424, up +5.8% from 4,180 in February 2020.

Active Listings in February 2021 were 7,460, down 51.6% from 15,417 in February 2020.

Months of Supply was 0.9 Months in February 2021, compared to 2.1 Months in February 2020.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph from the Minnesota Association of REALTORS® shows inventory in Minnesota since 2012. Inventory had been trending down, and then declined significantly during the pandemic.

by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2021 10:33:00 AM

Note: Starting this week, the year-over-year comparisons are easy - since occupancy declined sharply at the onset of the pandemic - but occupancy is still down significantly from normal levels.

The occupancy rate is down 25.8% compared to the same week in 2019. Kelsey Fenerty at CoStar also suggests comparing to 2019: Indexing to 2019 Provides Better Hotel Performance Comparisons

From CoStar: STR: US Occupancy Reaches Highest Level in a Year With Pandemic Comparisons

U.S. weekly hotel occupancy reached its highest level in a year, according to STR‘s latest data through March 13.

March 7-13, 2021 (percentage change from comparable week in 2020):

• Occupancy: 52.1% (-1.4%)
• Average daily rate (ADR): US$102.62 (-14.5%)
• Revenue per available room (RevPAR): US$53.45 (-15.8%)

Year-over-year percentage changes are now more favorable as comparisons have shifted to pandemic-affected weeks from 2020. When indexed against 2019 levels, the U.S. has recaptured between 70-75% of occupancy in recent weeks.

Florida, lifted by Spring Break and Bike Week, was most represented among the leaders in week-to-week occupancy gains.
emphasis added

The following graph shows the seasonal pattern for the hotel occupancy rate using the four week average.

Click on graph for larger image.

The red line is for 2021, black is 2020, blue is the median, and dashed light blue is for 2009 (the worst year since the Great Depression for hotels prior to 2020).

Even when occupancy increases to 2009 levels, hotels will still be hurting.

Note: Y-axis doesn't start at zero to better show the seasonal change.

by Calculated Risk on 3/18/2021 08:37:00 AM

The DOL reported:

In the week ending March 13, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 770,000, an increase of 45,000 from the previous week's revised level. The previous week's level was revised up by 13,000 from 712,000 to 725,000. The 4-week moving average was 746,250, a decrease of 16,000 from the previous week's revised average. The previous week's average was revised up by 3,250 from 759,000 to 762,250.
emphasis added

This does not include the 282,394 initial claims for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) that was down from 478,914 the previous week.

The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since 1971.

Click on graph for larger image.

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased to 759,000.

The previous week was revised up.

Regular state continued claims decreased to 4,124,000​ (SA) from 4,142,000 (SA) the previous week and will likely stay at a high level until the crisis abates.

Note: There are an additional 7,615,386 receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) that decreased from 8,387,969 the previous week (there are questions about these numbers). This is a special program for business owners, self-employed, independent contractors or gig workers not receiving other unemployment insurance.  And an additional 4,815,348 receiving Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC) down from 5,456,080.

Weekly claims were higher than the consensus forecast.

by Calculated Risk on 3/17/2021 09:00:00 PM

Thursday:
• At 8:30 AM ET, The initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released.  The consensus is for a increase to 715 thousand from 712 thousand last week.

• Also at 8:30 AM, the Philly Fed manufacturing survey for March. The consensus is for a reading of 24.5, up from 23.1.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph from MortgageNewsDaily shows the average 30 year fixed rate mortgage rates over the last 10 years.

Mortgage rates at 3.40% are essentially back to the lows of 2012 and 2016.

by Calculated Risk on 3/17/2021 04:50:00 PM

From Bloomberg on vaccinations as of Mar 17th:

"So far, 113 million doses have been given. In the last week, an average of 2.47 million doses per day were administered."

Here is the CDC COVID Data Tracker. This site has data on vaccinations, cases and more.

And check out COVID Act Now to see how each state is doing. (updated link to new site)

There have been over 22,000 US deaths reported in March due to COVID.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows the daily (columns) 7 day average (line) of positive tests reported.

This data is from the CDC.

The 7-day average is 54,421, well above the low following the summer surge of 35,000.

The second graph shows the number of people hospitalized.

This data is also from the CDC.

The CDC cautions that due to reporting delays, the area in grey will probably increase.

The current 7-day average is 34,295 well above the post-summer surge low of 23,000.

by Calculated Risk on 3/17/2021 02:08:00 PM

Statement here.

Fed Chair Powell press conference video here starting at 2:30 PM ET.

Here are the projections.

Wall Street forecasts are for GDP to increase at a 6% to 8% annual rate in Q1. For the year, from Goldman Sachs "We have raised our GDP forecast to reflect the latest fiscal policy news and now expect 8% growth in 2021 (Q4/Q4) and an unemployment rate of 4% at end-2021"

The FOMC also increased their GDP forecast to 5.8% to 6.6%.  GDP for 2023 was revised down.

GDP projections of Federal Reserve Governors and Reserve Bank presidents, Change in Real GDP1
Projection Date	2021	2022	2023
Mar 2021	5.8 to 6.6	3.0 to 3.8	2.0 to 2.5
Dec 2020	3.7 to 5.0	3.0 to 3.5	2.2 to 2.7

¹ Projections of change in real GDP and inflation are from the fourth quarter of the previous year to the fourth quarter of the year indicated.

The unemployment rate was at 6.2% in February.

Note that the unemployment rate doesn't remotely capture the economic damage to the labor market.  Not only are there 10 million people unemployed, but 4.2 million people have left the labor force since January 2020.  And millions more are being supported by various provisions of the various disaster relief acts.

The decline in the unemployment rate depends on both job growth, and the participation rate. A strong labor market will probably encourage people to return to the labor force, and the improvements in the unemployment rate might be slower than some expect.

The unemployment rate was revised down for all years.

Unemployment projections of Federal Reserve Governors and Reserve Bank presidents, Unemployment Rate2
Projection Date	2021	2022	2023
Mar 2021	4.2 to 4.7	3.6 to 4.0	3.2 to 3.8
Dec 2020	4.7 to 5.4	3.8 to 4.6	3.5 to 4.3

² Projections for the unemployment rate are for the average civilian unemployment rate in the fourth quarter of the year indicated.

As of January 2020, PCE inflation was up 1.5% from January 2020.

The projections for inflation were revised up and the FOMC sees inflation above target in 2021.

Inflation projections of Federal Reserve Governors and Reserve Bank presidents, PCE Inflation1
Projection Date	2021	2022	2023
Mar 2021	2.2 to 2.4	1.8 to 2.1	2.0 to 2.2
Dec 2020	1.7 to 1.9	1.8 to 2.0	1.9 to 2.1

PCE core inflation was up 1.5% in January year-over-year.

Projections for core inflation were revised up.

Core Inflation projections of Federal Reserve Governors and Reserve Bank presidents, Core Inflation1
Projection Date	2021	2022	2023
Mar 2021	2.0 to 2.3	1.9 to 2.1	2.0 to 2.2
Dec 2020	1.7 to 1.8	1.8 to 2.0	1.9 to 2.1

by Calculated Risk on 3/17/2021 02:02:00 PM

Fed Chair Powell press conference video here starting at 2:30 PM ET.

FOMC Statement:

The Federal Reserve is committed to using its full range of tools to support the U.S. economy in this challenging time, thereby promoting its maximum employment and price stability goals.

The COVID-19 pandemic is causing tremendous human and economic hardship across the United States and around the world. Following a moderation in the pace of the recovery, indicators of economic activity and employment have turned up recently, although the sectors most adversely affected by the pandemic remain weak. Inflation continues to run below 2 percent. Overall financial conditions remain accommodative, in part reflecting policy measures to support the economy and the flow of credit to U.S. households and businesses.

The path of the economy will depend significantly on the course of the virus, including progress on vaccinations. The ongoing public health crisis continues to weigh on economic activity, employment, and inflation, and poses considerable risks to the economic outlook.

The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. With inflation running persistently below this longer-run goal, the Committee will aim to achieve inflation moderately above 2 percent for some time so that inflation averages 2 percent over time and longer‑term inflation expectations remain well anchored at 2 percent. The Committee expects to maintain an accommodative stance of monetary policy until these outcomes are achieved. The Committee decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and expects it will be appropriate to maintain this target range until labor market conditions have reached levels consistent with the Committee's assessments of maximum employment and inflation has risen to 2 percent and is on track to moderately exceed 2 percent for some time. In addition, the Federal Reserve will continue to increase its holdings of Treasury securities by at least $80 billion per month and of agency mortgage‑backed securities by at least $40 billion per month until substantial further progress has been made toward the Committee's maximum employment and price stability goals. These asset purchases help foster smooth market functioning and accommodative financial conditions, thereby supporting the flow of credit to households and businesses.

In assessing the appropriate stance of monetary policy, the Committee will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook. The Committee would be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy as appropriate if risks emerge that could impede the attainment of the Committee's goals. The Committee's assessments will take into account a wide range of information, including readings on public health, labor market conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments.

Voting for the monetary policy action were Jerome H. Powell, Chair; John C. Williams, Vice Chair; Thomas I. Barkin; Raphael W. Bostic; Michelle W. Bowman; Lael Brainard; Richard H. Clarida; Mary C. Daly; Charles L. Evans; Randal K. Quarles; and Christopher J. Waller.

emphasis added