by Calculated Risk on 6/28/2012 11:03:00 AM
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Kansas City Fed: Growth in Regional Manufacturing Activity Slowed in June
From the Kansas City Fed: Growth in Tenth District Manufacturing Eased Further Activity Slowed
Growth in Tenth District manufacturing activity slowed in June, and expectations eased as producers grew more uncertain.. ...The regional manufacturing surveys were mostly weaker in June, especially the Philly Fed index.
The month-over-month composite index was 3 in June, down from 9 in May and equal to 3 in April ... The production index eased from 17 to 12, and the new orders index fell back into negative territory after rising slightly last month. Order backlogs continued to ease. The employment index moved lower but remained positive, while the new orders for exports index decreased.
Price indexes moderated for the second straight month, including an actual decline in monthly selling prices. The month-over-month finished goods price index dropped from 0 to -4, its lowest level since mid-2010, and the raw materials price index also decreased.
Here is a graph comparing the regional Fed surveys and the ISM manufacturing index:
Click on graph for larger image.
The New York and Philly Fed surveys are averaged together (dashed green, through June), and five Fed surveys are averaged (blue, through June) including New York, Philly, Richmond, Dallas and Kansas City. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) PMI (red) is through May (right axis).
The ISM index for June will be released Monday, July 2nd, and these surveys suggest some decrease from the 53.5 reading in May.
Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims mostly unchanged
by Calculated Risk on 6/28/2012 08:30:00 AM
The DOL reports:
In the week ending June 23, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 386,000, a decrease of 6,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 392,000. The 4-week moving average was 386,750, a decrease of 750 from the previous week's revised average of 387,500.The previous week was revised up from 387,000 to 392,000.
The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.
Click on graph for larger image.
The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims declined slightly to 386,750.
This is just off the high for the year.
And here is a long term graph of weekly claims:
This was near the consensus forecast of 385,000 and suggests some renewed weakness in the labor market.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Tomorrow: Unemployment Claims, Q1 GDP (third estimate)
by Calculated Risk on 6/27/2012 10:30:00 PM
The focus tomorrow will be on the start of the two day European summit in Brussels, and also on the SCOTUS ruling on the health care law. The ruling on the Affordable Care Act is expected a little after 10 AM ET. (the SCOTUSblog is a good resource).
On Thursday:
• At 8:30 AM ET, The initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for claims to decline to 385 thousand from 387 thousand last week.
• Also at 8:30 AM, the third estimate of Q1 GDP will be released. The consensus is that real GDP increased 1.9% annualized in Q1; no change from the 2nd estimate.
• At 11:00 AM, the Kansas City Fed regional Manufacturing Survey for June will be released this is the last of the regional Fed surveys for June, and three out of four have been below expectations. The consensus is for a decrease to 4 from 9 in May (above zero is expansion).
Number of Cities with Increasing House Prices
by Calculated Risk on 6/27/2012 08:03:00 PM
The following graph shows the number of cities with increasing house prices on a year-over-year and month-over-month basis.
This graph is based on the Case-Shiller Composite 20 cities using seasonally adjusted data starting in January 2001.
Most cities were seeing month-over-month increases every month through 2005. In 2006, some cities started seeing year-over-year declines (red). There were still a few cities with increasing prices in early 2007. The increases in 2009 and 2010 were related to the housing tax credit (all of those gains and more are gone).
Recently prices have started increasing in more and more cities. Note: Case-Shiller data is through April.
Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.
In April 2012, 17 cities saw month-over-month price increases (SA), and 10 cities saw year-over-year price increases.
I expect that the number of cities with a year-over-year price increase will continue to climb, and in a few months the Case-Shiller Composite 20 index will turn positive on a year-over-year basis.
Lawler on Lennar: Net Home Orders Jump, Pricing Improves in “Most” Markets
by Calculated Risk on 6/27/2012 04:29:00 PM
From economist Tom Lawler:
Lennar Corporation, the 3rd largest US home builder in 2011, reported that net home orders in the quarter ended May 31, 2012 totaled 4,481, up 39.9% from the comparable quarter of last year. The company’s sales cancellation rate, expressed as a % of gross orders, was 16% last quarter, down from 17% a year ago. Home deliveries last quarter totaled 3,222, up 20.1% from the comparable quarter last year. Lennar’s order backlog at the end of May was 3,970, up 60.7% from last May.CR Note: It helps to watch the builders. In early May, Tom Lawler sent me a chart on homebuilder sales, and Tom argued we'd see upward revisions to new home sales:
As with most other builders, Lennar reported that “pricing trends” were positive in “most” markets last quarter. Here are some comments by CEO Stuart Miller in the press release.
"Evidence from the field suggests that the 'for sale' housing market has, in fact, bottomed and that we have commenced a slow and steady recovery process. And while the housing downturn was broad-based and national, the recovery process continues to be very localized. Although highly conservative mortgage lending practices and challenging appraisals remain a constant headwind, we are experiencing net positive price and volume trends in most of our markets."
Mr. Miller continued, "As the overall housing market has continued to improve over the last several quarters, our well located communities and product execution has allowed us to outperform the market. During the quarter, deliveries increased 20%, new orders increased 40%, backlog increased 61% and our operating margin increased over 100% to 9.2%, our highest margin percentage since Q2 2006. This operating leverage was driven by our ability to increase sales per community, raise prices and lower incentives, and control our overhead costs."
Lennar’s results easily beat “consensus.”
"[R]ight now I estimate that revisions will lift Census’s estimates of new SF home sales last quarter from an average seasonally adjusted annual rate of 337,000 to a SAAR of 350,000."Sure enough, the Commerce Department has revised up Q1 new home sales to an average of just over 350,000.
Tom adds another key point today:
While the new home sales report exceeded “consensus,” recent numbers might even have been stronger if builders on average had higher inventories for sale. After being burned several times with some “false” signs of recovery, most builders have been pretty conservative in both “spec” building and community-count growth.
Merle Hazard: "Fiscal Cliff"
by Calculated Risk on 6/27/2012 01:40:00 PM
A new song from Merle Hazard called the "Fiscal Cliff"
This was debuted on PBS Making Sen$e this morning, see: A Q-and-A, Plus a Ditty and Contest as U.S. Races Toward the 'Fiscal Cliff'
They are having a contest for a new song. From Merle:
Though I'm a country singer, I also love surf-style music. The only thing wrong with the genre is that these songs are always -- of course -- about surfing, as well as teenage romance and drag races. There should be more on macro-economic topics and political economy. So I'd like to do another one like 'Fiscal Cliff,' but I'm out of ideas. I'm hoping NewsHour audience might help. I have in mind a song contest. Submit a topic, a key phrase, or a whole lyric. Whatever you like.
Housing: Inventory and Negative Equity
by Calculated Risk on 6/27/2012 11:57:00 AM
In the Pending Home Sales report this morning, the NAR analysts noted:
Low inventory results partly from underwater homeowners who are unwilling to list their homes, which would require a lengthy short sale process, or additional cash to complete the transaction. NAR estimates 85 percent of homeowners have positive equity, with 15 percent in an underwater situation.Zillow chief economist Stan Humphries has been discussing this: The Connection Between Negative Equity, Inventory Shortage and Increasing Home Values: Why the Bottom Won’t Be as Boring as We Expected
What markets like Miami and Phoenix may now be showing us is that negative equity has another very powerful effect on the supply side beyond increasing the flow of foreclosed homes onto the market: all the households that we predicted would be trapped in their homes and unable to buy new ones are similarly unable to sell their current homes, severely decreasing the overall supply of homes on the market.CR comment: Negative equity is probably contributing to the lower levels of inventory, but I think there are other factors too.
...
And negative equity may well be so constraining the supply side of the housing market that it’s creating acute inventory shortages that are bidding up prices.
...
What does all of this imply for the housing bottom? Our emerging hypothesis is that, instead of a long, flat bottom with price appreciation constrained by weak demand and elevated foreclosures, we might end up in an environment in which constrained supply (due to negative equity), together with robust demand from investors and first-time home buyers (not weighed down by negative equity), combine to create cycles of home value spikes followed by cooling periods. These cooling periods are created once local home values have risen enough to free some homeowners from negative equity at which point some of these resurfacing homeowners attempt to sell their homes, thus creating additional supply which tempers price appreciation.
One key is the substantial increase in investor owned single family homes. These are not "flippers", but cash flow investors - and these investors will not sell just because prices have risen a few percent (I've talked with some of these investors, and they many are making 8% to 12% cash-on-cash after expenses - and they have no intention of selling in the near term). Economist Tom Lawler discussed this back in February, and concluded that a significant "share of the decline in the share of homes for sale reflects the acquisition of SF (and condo) properties by investors as multi-year rental properties".
Another key driver of lower inventory is price expectations. As I noted: "When the expectation is that prices will fall further, marginal sellers will try to sell their homes immediately. And marginal buyers will decide to wait for a lower price. This leads to more inventory on the market. But when the expectation is that prices are stabilizing (the current situation), sellers will wait until it is convenient to sell."
So there are several factors pushing down inventory - and it looks like inventory was flat or declined in June too. The recent NAR report was for May; below are some numbers for June, and it is possible inventory has already peaked for the year.
According to the deptofnumbers.com for (54 metro areas), inventory is off 22.0% compared to June 2011. Unfortunately the deptofnumbers only started tracking inventory in April 2006.
This graph shows the NAR estimate of existing home inventory through May (left axis) and the HousingTracker data for the 54 metro areas through June.
Click on graph for larger image.
Since the NAR released their revisions for sales and inventory, the NAR and HousingTracker inventory numbers have tracked pretty well.
On a seasonal basis, housing inventory usually bottoms in December and January and then starts to increase again through the summer. So inventory still might increase a little over the next couple of months, but the forecasts for a "surge" in inventory this summer were clearly incorrect. It is even possible that inventory has already peaked for the year.
The second graph shows the year-over-year change in inventory for both the NAR and HousingTracker.
HousingTracker reported that the June listings, for the 54 metro areas, declined 22.0% from the same month last year. So far in 2012, there has only been a small seasonal increase in inventory.
Whatever the reasons - negative equity, investor owned properties, "price expectations", or other reasons - this decline in active inventory remains a significant story.
NAR: Pending home sales index increased 5.9% in May
by Calculated Risk on 6/27/2012 10:04:00 AM
From the NAR: Pending Home Sales Up in May, Continue Pattern of Strong Annual Gains
The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contract signings, rose 5.9 percent to 101.1 in May from 95.5 in April and is 13.3 percent above May 2011 when it was 89.2. The data reflect contracts but not closings.This was above the consensus of a 1.2% increase for this index.
The index also reached 101.1 in March, which is the highest level since April 2010 when buyers were rushing to beat the deadline for the home buyer tax credit.
The PHSI in the Northeast increased 4.8 percent to 82.9 in May and is 19.8 percent above May 2011. In the Midwest the index rose 6.3 percent to 98.9 in May and is 22.1 percent higher than a year ago. Pending home sales in the South increased 1.1 percent to an index of 106.9 in May and are 11.9 percent above May 2011. In the West the index jumped 14.5 percent in May to 108.7 and is 4.8 percent stronger than a year ago.
Contract signings usually lead sales by about 45 to 60 days, so this is for sales in June and July.
MBA: Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest Weekly Survey
by Calculated Risk on 6/27/2012 07:05:00 AM
From the MBA: Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey
The Refinance Index decreased 8 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 1 percent from one week earlier.Click on graph for larger image.
“Refinance volume fell last week due largely to a fall-off in refinance applications for government loans, which had more than doubled the prior week,” said Michael Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President of Research and Economics. “The large swings in activity were due to the implementation of FHA’s new premiums on streamline refinances, and borrowers timing their applications to lower their premiums.”
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,500 or less) increased to 3.88 percent from 3.87 percent, with points decreasing to 0.40 from 0.49 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) loans.
The purchase index is mostly moving sideways.
Refinance activity has been increasing, and the decline this week followed the surge in FHA streamline refinancing last week. With mortgage rates near record lows, refinance activity will probably stay fairly strong.
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Look Ahead: Durable Goods, Pending Home Sales
by Calculated Risk on 6/26/2012 09:25:00 PM
The two day European summit starts on Thursday, and there will be more pre-meeting position statements tomorrow. Here was some "positioning" today:
From Reuters: Merkel buries euro bonds as summit tension rises
Two days before a crucial European Union summit, European Council President Herman Van Rompuy released a seven-page report on closer fiscal and banking union envisaging a euro zone treasury that would issue common debt in the medium term.From the Financial Times: Monti lashes out at Germany ahead of summit
Merkel immediately stamped on the idea of mutualising debt - favored by France, Italy and Spain - at a meeting of lawmakers from her Free Democratic coalition partners in Berlin, according to people who attended the closed-door session.
"I don't see total debt liability as long as I live," she was quoted as saying, a day after branding the idea of euro bonds "economically wrong and counterproductive".
Mario Monti has set the stage for a tough fight with Germany at the EU summit this week, insisting that he will continue to push Italy’s proposal to use eurozone bailout funds in an attempt to stabilise financial markets.I don't expect much from this summit except an extension for Greece. I'm keeping an eye on Europe, but not watching too closely!
Excerpt with permission
On Wednesday:
• At 7:00 AM ET, The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the mortgage purchase applications index.
• At 8:30 AM, Durable Goods Orders for May will be released by the Census Bureau. The consensus is for a 0.4% increase in durable goods orders.
• Also at 10:00 AM, the NAR will released the Pending Home Sales Index for May. The consensus is for a 1.2% increase in the index.
Earlier on house prices:
• Case Shiller: House Prices increased in April
• Real House Prices and Price-to-Rent Ratio
• House Prices to increase 10%?
• All Current House Price Graphs
Misc: Richmond Fed Survey shows contraction, Consumer confidence declines
by Calculated Risk on 6/26/2012 05:54:00 PM
Some earlier releases ...
From the Richmond Fed: Manufacturing Activity Eased in June, But Expectations Remained Upbeat
Manufacturing activity in the central Atlantic region softened in June, following six months of moderate expansion, according to the Richmond Fed's latest survey.Three out of four regional manufacturing surveys have been below expectations in June.
In June, the seasonally adjusted composite index of manufacturing activity — our broadest measure of manufacturing — lost seven points to −3 from May's reading of 4. Among the index's components, shipments declined two points to −2, new orders dropped thirteen points to end at −12, and the jobs index moved down eight points to 8.
And from the Conference Board: The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index® Declines Again
The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index®, which had declined in May, fell further in June. The Index now stands at 62.0 (1985=100), down from 64.4 in May. The Expectations Index declined to 72.3 from 77.3. The Present Situation Index, however, increased to 46.6 from 44.9 last month.This was below expectations of a decline to 63.5. It seems the only "good news" these days is from housing!
Earlier on house prices:
• Case Shiller: House Prices increased in April
• Real House Prices and Price-to-Rent Ratio
• All Current House Price Graphs
House Prices to increase 10%?
by Calculated Risk on 6/26/2012 02:36:00 PM
Leave it to the NAR to get overly enthusiastic.
From Jeff Collins at the O.C. Register: Realtor guru: 10% home-price jump possible
"This time next year, there could be a 10% price appreciation. I would not be surprised to see that,” [National Association of Realtors Chief Economist Lawrence] Yun said.It is one thing for prices to stop falling - and maybe increase a little over the next year. But, in addition to the large number of homes in the foreclosure pipeline, there are also many people waiting for a "better market" to sell - and I suspect the slightest appreciation will bring more inventory to market. A 10% increase over the next year? Well, three words: Not. Gonna. Happen.
Earlier on house prices:
• Case Shiller: House Prices increased in April
• Real House Prices and Price-to-Rent Ratio
• All Current House Price Graphs
Real House Prices and Price-to-Rent Ratio
by Calculated Risk on 6/26/2012 12:03:00 PM
Nick Timiraos at the WSJ has a nice summary: Why Home Prices Are Rising Again (According to Case-Shiller)
It wasn’t hard to see this coming: Home prices rose in April after a spring that bought more buyers chasing fewer homes.Yes, this was pretty easy to see coming. A key question is: Did nominal house prices bottom in March or will there be further price declines?
I think it is likely that prices have bottomed, although I expect prices to be choppy going forward - and I expect any nominal price increase over the next year or two to be small.
I've seen some forecasts of additional 20% price declines on the repeat sales indexes. Three words: Not. Gonna. Happen.
Others, like Barry Ritholtz at the Big Picture, have argued that we could see an additional 10% price decline in the Case-Shiller indexes. I think that is unlikely, but not impossible. The argument for further price declines is that there are still a large number of distressed properties in the foreclosure pipeline - and that there are over 10 million property owners with negative equity, and that could lead to even more distressed sales. So even though prices are pretty much back to "normal" based on real prices and price-to-rent ratio (see below), the argument is that all of these distressed sales could push prices down further. Also, Barry argues that prices following a bubble usually "overshoot".
Those are solid arguments, but I think that some of the policy initiatives (refinance programs, emphasis on modifications, REO-to-rental and more) will lessen the downward pressure from distressed sales - and I also think any "overshoot" will be in real terms (inflation adjusted) as opposed to nominal terms. It is probably correct that any increase in house prices will lead to more inventory (sellers waiting for a "better market"), but that is an argument for why prices will not increase - as opposed to an argument for further price declines.
My view is prices will be up slightly year-over-year next March (when prices usually bottom seasonally for the repeat sales indexes). Some analysts see a small decrease (like 1% to 2%) over the next 12 months, but that isn't much different than a small increase (when compared to forecasts of 10% or 20% declines).
And here is another update a few graphs: Case-Shiller, CoreLogic and others report nominal house prices, and it is also useful to look at house prices in real terms (adjusted for inflation) and as a price-to-rent ratio. Below are three graphs showing nominal prices (as reported), real prices and a price-to-rent ratio. Real prices, and the price-to-rent ratio, are back to late 1998 and early 2000 levels depending on the index.
Nominal House Prices
Click on graph for larger image.
The first graph shows the quarterly Case-Shiller National Index SA (through Q1 2012), and the monthly Case-Shiller Composite 20 SA and CoreLogic House Price Indexes (through April) in nominal terms as reported.
In nominal terms, the Case-Shiller National index (SA) is back to Q4 2002 levels, and even with the recent small increase, the Case-Shiller Composite 20 Index (SA) is back to March 2003 levels, and the CoreLogic index (NSA) is back to May 2003.
Real House Prices
The second graph shows the same three indexes in real terms (adjusted for inflation using CPI less Shelter). Note: some people use other inflation measures to adjust for real prices.
In real terms, the National index is back to Q4 1998 levels, the Composite 20 index is back to March 2000, and the CoreLogic index back to February 2000.
As we've discussed before, in real terms, all of the appreciation in the '00s is gone.
Price-to-Rent
In October 2004, Fed economist John Krainer and researcher Chishen Wei wrote a Fed letter on price to rent ratios: House Prices and Fundamental Value. Kainer and Wei presented a price-to-rent ratio using the OFHEO house price index and the Owners' Equivalent Rent (OER) from the BLS.
Here is a similar graph using the Case-Shiller National, Composite 20 and CoreLogic House Price Indexes.
This graph shows the price to rent ratio (January 1998 = 1.0).
On a price-to-rent basis, the Case-Shiller National index is back to Q4 1998 levels, the Composite 20 index is back to March 2000 levels, and the CoreLogic index is back to April 2000.
In real terms - and as a price-to-rent ratio - prices are mostly back to late 1990s or early 2000 levels.
Case Shiller: House Prices increased in April
by Calculated Risk on 6/26/2012 09:00:00 AM
S&P/Case-Shiller released the monthly Home Price Indices for April (a 3 month average of February, March and April).
This release includes prices for 20 individual cities and two composite indices (for 10 cities and 20 cities).
Note: Case-Shiller reports NSA, I use the SA data.
From S&P: Home Prices Rise in April 2012 According to the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices
Data through April 2012, released today by S&P Indices for its S&P/CaseShiller Home Price Indices ... showed that on average home prices increased 1.3% in the month of April for both the 10- and 20-City Composites. This comes after seven consecutive months of falling home prices as measured by both indices.Click on graph for larger image.
April’s data indicate that on an annual basis home prices fell by 2.2% for the 10-City Composite and by 1.9% for the 20-City Composites, versus April 2011. While still negative, this is an improvement over the annual rates of -2.9% and -2.6% recorded for the month of March 2012. Both Composites and 18 of the 20 MSAs saw increases in annual returns in April compared to those published for March; only Detroit and New York fared worse in April ...
...
“With April 2012 data, we finally saw some rising home prices,” says David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Indices. “On a monthly basis, 19 of the 20 MSAs and both Composites rose in April over March. Detroit was the only city that saw prices fall, down 3.6%. In addition, 18 of the 20 MSAs and both Composites saw better annual rates of return. It has been a long time since we enjoyed such broadbased gains. While one month does not make a trend, particularly during seasonally strong buying months, the combination of rising positive monthly index levels and improving annual returns is a good sign.
The first graph shows the nominal seasonally adjusted Composite 10 and Composite 20 indices (the Composite 20 was started in January 2000).
The Composite 10 index is off 33.3% from the peak, and up 0.7% in April (SA). The Composite 10 is up from the post bubble low set in March, Not Seasonally Adjusted (NSA).
The Composite 20 index is off 33.0% from the peak, and up 0.7% (SA) in April. The Composite 20 is also up from the post-bubble low set in March (NSA).
The second graph shows the Year over year change in both indices.
The Composite 10 SA is down 2.2% compared to April 2011.
The Composite 20 SA is down 1.9% compared to April 2011. This was a smaller year-over-year decline for both indexes than in March.
The third graph shows the price declines from the peak for each city included in S&P/Case-Shiller indices.
Prices increased (SA) in 17 of the 20 Case-Shiller cities in April seasonally adjusted (18 cities increased NSA). Prices in Las Vegas are off 61.1% from the peak, and prices in Dallas only off 6.2% from the peak. Note that the red column (cumulative decline through April 2012) is the lowest for only a couple of cities.
This was better than the consensus forecast, and the NSA indexes are above the post-bubble lows set last month (NSA). I'll have more on prices later.
Monday, June 25, 2012
Look Ahead: Case-Shiller House Prices
by Calculated Risk on 6/25/2012 09:31:00 PM
The key report tomorrow will be the Case-Shiller house price index for April. Of course most of the focus will be on Europe and the summit meeting later this week.
On Europe, the Financial Times reports: EU could rewrite eurozone budgets
The European Union would gain far-reaching powers to rewrite national budgets for eurozone countries that breach debt and deficit rules under proposals likely to be discussed at a summit this week, according to a draft report seen by the Financial Times.• At 9:00 AM ET, S&P/Case-Shiller House Price Index for April will be released. The consensus is for a 2.3% decrease year-over-year in Composite 20 prices (NSA) in April. I think the year-over-year decline will be smaller than the consensus.
The proposals are part of an ambitious plan to turn the eurozone into a closer fiscal union ...
Excerpt with permission
• At 10:00 AM, The Conference Board's consumer confidence index for June will be released. The consensus is for a decrease to 63.5 from 64.9 last month.
• Also at 10:00 AM, the Richmond Fed Survey of Manufacturing Activity for June will be released. The consensus is for an increase to 5 for this survey from 4 in May (above zero is expansion). So far the NY Fed (Empire State) and Philly Fed surveys were lower than expected, but the Dallas Fed survey was above expectations.
When will the Case-Shiller house price index turn positive Year-over-year?
by Calculated Risk on 6/25/2012 06:43:00 PM
On Friday I posted Zillow's forecasts for the April Case-Shiller indexes to be released tomorrow. The year-over-year (YoY) decline in Case-Shiller prices has been getting smaller all year, and the Zillow forecast suggests the YoY decline will be smaller still in April - and be the smallest YoY decline since the expiration of the housing tax credit.
This raises the question: When will the Case-Shiller indexes turn positive year-over-year?
I looked at the recent improvement in prices (comparing the month-to-month changes for the NSA index to last year). At the current pace of improvement, it looks like the YoY change will turn positive in either the August or September reports.
It is important to remember that most of the sales that will be included in the August report have already been signed. The August Case-Shiller report will be a 3 month average of closing prices for June, July and August - and the contracts are usually signed 45 to 60 days before closing. So just about all of the contracts that will close in July have been signed, and probably many of the contracts that will close in August have already been signed.
So any increase in inventory will probably not impact the August Case-Shiller house price report. Note: we haven't seen any increase yet through June, and I don't expect a huge surge in inventory - but others do.
Click on graph for larger image.
Here is a graph of the YoY change in the Case-Shiller Composite 10 and 20 indexes. In March, the indexes were down 2.8% and 2.6%, respectively.
Zillow is forecasting the Composite 10 index will be down 2.4% YoY in April, and the Composite 20 index will be down 1.9%.
Earlier this year, when I argued prices were near the bottom for the Not Seasonally Adjusted (NSA) repeat sales indexes, I thought the year-over-year change would turn positive late this year or early in 2013. Right now it looks like August or September of this year.
Dallas Fed: Regional Manufacturing Activity "Surges" in June
by Calculated Risk on 6/25/2012 02:52:00 PM
Here is a bit of an outlier this month ... earlier from the Dallas Fed: Texas Manufacturing Activity Surges but Outlook Largely Unchanged
Texas factory activity surged in June, according to business executives responding to the Texas Manufacturing Outlook Survey. The production index, a key measure of state manufacturing conditions, rose from 5.5 to 15.5, posting its strongest reading in 15 months.This was above expectations of a zero reading for the general business activity index.
Other measures of current manufacturing conditions also indicated strengthening activity in June. The new orders index rose to 7.9, following three readings around zero, suggesting demand finally grew after staying flat since February. ... The general business activity index had been negative in April and May but increased to 5.8 this month.
...
Labor market indicators reflected stronger labor demand growth and steady workweeks. Employment grew at a faster pace in June, with the index rising from 8.5 to 13.7. Twenty-one percent of firms reported hiring new workers, while 8 percent reported layoffs. The hours worked index was 1, suggesting little change in workweek length.
There are two more regional surveys to be released this week, and the ISM index for June will be released Monday, July 2nd.
Earlier on New Home Sales:
• New Home Sales increase in May to 369,000 Annual Rate
• Home Sales Reports: What Matters
• New Home Sales graphs
Home Sales Reports: What Matters
by Calculated Risk on 6/25/2012 12:18:00 PM
After the existing home sales report for May was released last week, I saw several cautionary comments focused on the decline in sales in May (from 4.62 million in April to 4.55 million in May). The key number in the existing home sales report is not sales, but inventory. It is visible inventory that impacts prices (although the "shadow" inventory will keep prices from rising).
When we look at sales for existing homes, the focus should be on the composition between conventional and distressed. Total sales are probably close to the normal level of turnover, but the composition of sales is far from normal - sales are still heavily distressed sales. Over time, existing home sales will probably settle around 5 million per year, but the percentage of distressed sales will eventually decline. Those looking at the number of existing home sales for a recovery in housing are looking at the wrong number. Look at inventory and the percent of conventional sales.
However, for the new home sales report, the key number is sales! An increase in sales adds to both GDP and employment (completed inventory is at record lows, so any increase in sales will translate to more single family starts).
It might be hard to believe, but earlier this year there was a debate on whether housing had bottomed. That debate is over - clearly new home sales have bottomed – and the debate is now about the strength of the recovery. Although sales are still historically very weak, sales are up 35% from the low, and up about 24% from the May 2010 through September 2011 average.
Some people think housing will recover rapidly to the 1.2+ million rate we saw in 2004 and 2005. I think that is incorrect for two reasons. First, I think the recovery will be sluggish - 2012 will probably be the third worst year ever. Second, the 1.2 million in annual sales was due to an increasing homeownership rate and speculative buying. With a stable homeownerhip rate, and little speculative buying, sales will probably only rise to around 800 thousand at full recovery.
With existing home sales around 5 million per year, and new home sales around 800 thousand per year, the “distressing gap” in the graph below will be closed.
Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.
This "distressing gap" graph that shows existing home sales (left axis) and new home sales (right axis) through May. This graph starts in 1994, but the relationship has been fairly steady back to the '60s.
Following the housing bubble and bust, the "distressing gap" appeared mostly because of distressed sales. The flood of distressed sales has kept existing home sales elevated, and depressed new home sales since builders haven't been able to compete with the low prices of all the foreclosed properties.
This gap will eventually close, but it will probably take a number of years.
Note: Existing home sales are counted when transactions are closed, and new home sales are counted when contracts are signed. So the timing of sales is different.
Earlier:
• New Home Sales increase in May to 369,000 Annual Rate
• New Home Sales graphs
New Home Sales increase in May to 369,000 Annual Rate
by Calculated Risk on 6/25/2012 10:00:00 AM
The Census Bureau reports New Home Sales in May were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 369 thousand. This was up from 343 thousand SAAR in April. Sales in February and March were revised up.
The first graph shows New Home Sales vs. recessions since 1963. The dashed line is the current sales rate.
Sales of new single-family houses in May 2012 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 369,000 ... 7.6 percent above the revised April rate of 343,000 and is 19.8 percent above the May 2011 estimate of 308,000.Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.
The second graph shows New Home Months of Supply.
Months of supply decreased to 4.7 in May from 5.0 in April.
The all time record was 12.1 months of supply in January 2009.
This is now in the normal range (less than 6 months supply is normal).
The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of May was 145,000. This represents a supply of 4.7 months at the current sales rate.On inventory, according to the Census Bureau:
"A house is considered for sale when a permit to build has been issued in permit-issuing places or work has begun on the footings or foundation in nonpermit areas and a sales contract has not been signed nor a deposit accepted."Starting in 1973 the Census Bureau broke this down into three categories: Not Started, Under Construction, and Completed.
This graph shows the three categories of inventory starting in 1973.
The inventory of completed homes for sale was at a record low 43,000 units in May. The combined total of completed and under construction is at the lowest level since this series started.
The last graph shows sales NSA (monthly sales, not seasonally adjusted annual rate).
In May 2012 (red column), 35 thousand new homes were sold (NSA). Last year only 28 thousand homes were sold in May. This was the fourth weakest May since this data has been tracked. The high for May was 120 thousand in 2005.
Even though sales are still very low, new home sales have clearly bottomed. New home sales have averaged 353 thousand SAAR over the first 5 months of 2012, after averaging under 300 thousand for the previous 18 months. All of the recent revisions have been up too. This was a very solid report and above the consensus forecast.
Chicago Fed: Economic growth slower in May
by Calculated Risk on 6/25/2012 08:40:00 AM
The Chicago Fed released the national activity index (a composite index of other indicators): Index shows slower economic growth in May
Led by declines in production-related indicators, the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) decreased to –0.45 in May from +0.08 in April. ...This graph shows the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (three month moving average) since 1967.
The index’s three-month moving average, CFNAI-MA3, decreased from –0.13 in April to –0.34 in May—its third consecutive reading below zero and its lowest value since June 2011. May’s CFNAI-MA3 suggests that growth in national economic activity was below its historical trend. The economic growth reflected in this level of the CFNAI-MA3 suggests subdued inflationary pressure from economic activity over the coming year.
Click on graph for larger image.
This suggests growth was below trend in May.
According to the Chicago Fed:
A zero value for the index indicates that the national economy is expanding at its historical trend rate of growth; negative values indicate below-average growth; and positive values indicate above-average growth.