by Calculated Risk on 10/13/2009 07:54:00 PM

“You can’t modify someone if they don’t have income or a job. We have to be realistic going forward. If we are going to play a numbers game, we are going to see a smaller percentage of borrowers in default able to be modified. It’s an unfortunate and difficult fact we are going to have to face.”
John Courson, president and CEO of the MBA, Oct 13, 2009.

Quote from Denver Business Journal: MBA: Creative efforts needed to deal with foreclosures

Maybe those NINJA loans weren't such a good idea either? (No income, no job and no assets)

The MBA also released their economic forecast for 2010: MBA Expects Economic Growth to Slow in First Half of 2010 Before Picking Up in Second Half, Originations Volume to Hit $1.5 Trillion

MBA expects economic growth to continue through the rest of 2009 before slowing in the first half of 2010. Unemployment is expected to climb to 10.2 percent by the middle of 2010 before beginning to moderate as economic growth resumes sustained growth in the second half of the year.

Although I think this is optimistic, it does highlight a key point.

The key drivers of positive growth in the second half of 2009 are inventory restocking, growth in residential investment (some increase in single family starts from the very depressed levels earlier this year), exports, and the fiscal stimulus.

The impact of the fiscal stimulus will wane in early 2010 (the stimulus won't add to GDP because it is at the peak level right about now, and will act as a drag later in 2010 as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act starts to wind down).

Inventory restocking is transitory, and without an increase in end demand, inventory investment will slow.

And any growth in residential investment will probably be sluggish, as Fed Vice Chairman Kohn noted today.

I guess that leaves exports ... but I suspect any growth in early 2010 will be very sluggish.

by Calculated Risk on 10/13/2009 04:12:00 PM

Fed Vice Chairman Donald Kohn spoke at the National Association for Business Economics conference in St. Louis, Missouri today: The Economic Outlook

Kohn outlines why he expects a moderate recovery (not V-shaped), and why he believes the risks to inflation are on the downside ...

A few excerpts:

All told, I expect that the recovery in U.S. economic activity will proceed at a moderate pace in the second half of this year before strengthening some in 2010. As we move into and through next year, inventory investment is likely to play a smaller role in supporting the growth of output, and aggregate activity should increasingly be propelled by stronger gains in final demand ...

[W]hy do I expect a gradual strengthening of economic activity? The fiscal stimulus program enacted earlier this year is likely playing a role, and it will continue to do so for a while as the states spend their stimulus funds to pay for infrastructure projects, hire more teachers, and finance other types of spending. But what will support economic activity as fiscal stimulus wanes?

Most importantly, support for private demand should come from a continuation of the improvements we've seen lately in overall financial conditions. Low market interest rates should continue to induce savers to diversify into riskier assets, which would contribute to a further reversal in the flight to liquidity and safety that has characterized the past few years. As the economy improves and credit losses become easier to size, banks will be able to build capital from earnings and outside investors, making them more able and willing to extend credit--in effect, allowing the low market interest rates to show through to the cost of capital for more borrowers. A more stable economic environment and greater availability of credit should contribute to the restoration of business and household confidence, further spurring spending.

An encouraging aspect of the improvement in economic and financial conditions in recent months has been the firming in house prices that I mentioned earlier. House prices can affect economic activity through several channels. One channel is through the influence of house prices on the net worth of households and, thereby, on consumer spending. Another channel is through the effect of anticipated capital gains or losses from investing in residential real estate on the demand for housing. Finally, greater stability in house prices should help reduce the uncertainty about the value of mortgages and mortgage-related securities held on the balance sheets of banks and other financial institutions, which should have a positive effect on their willingness to lend. This circumstance should nourish a constructive feedback loop between the financial sector and the real activity.

Given this possibility, another reasonable question might be, Why do I expect the economic recovery to be so moderate? To be sure, many times in the past, a deep recession has been followed by a sharp recovery. But, for a number of reasons, I don't think a V-shaped recovery is the most likely outcome this time around. First, although financial conditions are improving and market interest rates are very low, credit remains tight for many borrowers. In particular, the supply of bank credit remains very tight, and many securitization markets that do not enjoy support from the Federal Reserve or other government agencies are still impaired. Consumers as well as small and medium-sized businesses are especially feeling the effects of constraints on credit availability. Banks are still rebuilding their capital positions, and their lending will be held back by the need to work through the embedded losses in their portfolios of consumer and commercial real estate loans. Over time, as I already have noted, bank balance sheets should improve, and the supply of bank credit should ease. But the financial headwinds are likely to abate slowly, restraining the economic recovery.

In addition, I do not anticipate that the recovery in homebuilding will exhibit its typical cyclical pattern. Even though the decline in residential construction began well in advance of the overall contraction in real activity, the sector continues to have an oversupply of vacant homes. To be sure, by August, the inventory of unsold, newly built single-family houses had fallen appreciably from its peak level in the summer of 2006. Nonetheless, when compared with still low levels of sales, the supply of new houses remains elevated. In addition, the overhang of vacant houses on the market for existing homesis sizable, and the pace of foreclosures is likely to remain very elevated for a while, which should further add to that overhang. Thus, even with affordability quite favorable and house price expectations brighter, I anticipate a relatively subdued pickup in housing starts over the coming year.

In the business sector, the extraordinary amount of excess capacity is likely to be another factor tempering the rate of recovery. In manufacturing, the utilization rate currently is below 67 percent--noticeably less than the low points reached in prior post-World War II recessions. I expect that the wide margin of unused capacity, combined with the tight credit conditions faced by firms that have to rely primarily on bank lending, will lead many businesses to be quite cautious about the pace at which they increase their capital spending.

In part, the gradual pace I expect in the recovery of the economy toward full employment reflects the process of shifting the composition of aggregate demand and the way it is financed in response to the events of the past few years. In particular, consumers probably will do more saving out of their income, reflecting the likelihood that household net worth will be lower relative to income than over the past decade or so and that credit, appropriately, will be somewhat less available than during the boom that preceded the crisis. In addition, housing is almost certainly going to be a smaller part of the economy than it was earlier in this decade, as financial institutions maintain tighter underwriting standards that also more adequately reflect underlying risks. Such an increase in private saving propensities and a reduced demand for residential capital should prompt movements in relative prices and other factors that will, in turn, make room for a larger role for business investment and net exports in overall economic activity.

The transition to full employment and the complete emergence of this new configuration will take time, in part because the rebalancing of the economy involves repairs to balance sheets, the movement of capital and labor across sectors of the economy, and shifts in the global pattern of production and consumption--adjustments that are likely to be gradual under any conditions. Current circumstances, however, may slow the re-equilibration process more than might otherwise be the case because of the essential role of changes in the relative cost of finance in the adjustment process. But with the nominal federal funds rate essentially constrained at zero, and spreads in markets already having narrowed, reductions in the effective cost of capital will mainly take place as conditions at financial institutions improve and lenders ease borrowing standards, which as I have already discussed I expect to happen gradually.

As noted earlier, I expect that inflation will likely be subdued, and that, for a while, the risk of further declines in underlying rates of inflation will be greater than the risk of increases. That outlook rests importantly on two judgments: First, that the economy will be producing well below its potential for some time, which will directly restrain production costs and profit margins; and second, that inflation expectations are more likely to fall than rise over time as the level of real activity remains persistently less than its potential and actual inflation remains low.
...
But it's not the current level of inflation or of output that figure into our policy decisions directly--rather, it is the expected level some quarters out, after the lags in the effects of policy actions have worked themselves out. In that regard, the projection of only a gradual strengthening of demand and subdued inflation imply that that these gaps--of inflation and output below our objectives--are likely to persist for quite some time. In these circumstances, at its last meeting, the FOMC was of the view that economic conditions were likely to warrant unusually low levels of interest rates for an extended period.
emphasis added

by Calculated Risk on 10/13/2009 03:15:00 PM

From an article by Jody Shenn and Dawn Kopecki on Bloomberg: JPMorgan Pitches Interest-Only Mortgages to Boost Obama Plan

Banks will push the Obama administration to expand its mortgage-modification program to allow interest-only periods on reworked loans ... while recognizing concern that it may only postpone defaults, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.

“We’re working with our peers to develop a proposal to present,” Douglas Potolsky, a senior vice president at JPMorgan’s Chase home-loan unit, said yesterday at a Mortgage Bankers Association conference in San Diego.

This is simply more extend and pretend, and only postpones defaults.

The article also has some comments from Laurie Anne Maggiano, director of the Treasury’s policy office for homeownership preservation. Maggiano acknowleges that only "a couple thousand" modification are now permanent, and she notes that the trial period has been extended an extra two months (I guess a disappointing number of trial modifications are becoming permanent).

The key numbers to track going forward will be the number of permanent modificatons, and the redefault rate for permanent modifications. So far it is "a couple thousand" and too early to say.

The article also quotes Maggiano on the short sale initiative that should be announced next week. Housing Wire has more: Treasury to Announce New Program to Avoid Foreclosure

The Chief of the Homeowner Preservation Office at the Treasury, Laurie Maggiano, released information on the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) while speaking at the MBA’s 96th Annual Convention going on in San Diego. The official launch is expected in the next week or so.
...
Maggiano adds that HAFA will offer financial incentives to both servicers and borrowers, and associated secondary investors, in order to facilitate a short sale or deed in lieu of the property.

by Calculated Risk on 10/13/2009 01:23:00 PM

From DataQuick: Southern California home sales inch up; median price steady

Last month 21,539 new and resale houses and condos sold in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, Ventura, San Bernardino and Orange counties. That was up 0.2 percent from 21,502 in August and up 5.1 percent from 20,497 a year earlier, according to MDA DataQuick of San Diego.

September marked the 15th month in a row with a year-over-year sales gain, although last month’s was the smallest of those increases. ... The small uptick in September sales from August was atypical. On average, sales have fallen 9.5 percent between those two months.
...
“There were more than just normal, seasonal forces at work in these September sales numbers. More attempts at short sales, which typically take longer, and new appraisal rules no doubt delayed some deals this summer, causing them to close in September rather than August. September probably also got a boost from people opting to buy sooner rather than later to take advantage of the federal tax credit for first-time buyers, which is set to expire next month,” said John Walsh, MDA DataQuick president.
...
Foreclosure resales – houses and condos sold in September that had been foreclosed on at some point in the prior 12 months – made up 40.4 percent of all Southland homes resold last month. That was down slightly from a revised 41.7 percent foreclosure resales in August and down from a high of 56.7 percent in February this year.
...
A common form of financing used by first-time buyers in more affordable neighborhoods remained near record levels. Government-insured FHA mortgages made up 36.4 percent of all home purchase loans last month ...

Foreclosure activity remains high by historical standards.
emphasis added

Although DataQuick doesn't track short sales, we can estimate from the Sacramento data that another 15% or so of sales in SoCal were short sales - so probably over half the sales are distressed.

This report suggests sales were strong in September - similar to other regional reports.

We will probably see a decrease in year-over-year sales soon, as the first-time homebuyer tax credit buying frenzy subsides later this year.

by Calculated Risk on 10/13/2009 11:18:00 AM

Voit released Q3 quarterly reports today for CRE in Las Vegas, San Diego and Orange County.

The reports show the vacancy rates are up and lease rates falling. It also shows new construction has slowed sharply. Here are a couple of graphs for Orange County and San Diego. We are seeing a similar pattern nationwide ...


Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the annual Orange County office vacancy rate and new construction since 1988. See Voit report for more.

Note that in the previous slumps, office construction didn't pick up until the vacancy rate dropped below 10%.

From the Voit report:

Net absorption for the county posted a negative 438,803 square feet for the third quarter of 2009, giving the office market a total of 1.92 million square feet of negative absorption for the year.
...
The average asking Full Service Gross (FSG) lease rate per month per foot in Orange County is currently $2.24, which is a 16.73% decrease over last year’s rate of $2.69 and five cents lower than last quarter’s rate.
...
Total space under construction checked in at 166,455 square feet at the end of the third quarter, which is less than half the amount that was under construction this same time last year.
emphasis added

The second graph is for San Diego. The dynamics are similar, but absorption is slighly positive in San Diego. From Voit:

Net absorption for the county posted a positive 346,030 square feet for the third quarter of 2009, giving the office market a total of 653,537 square feet of positive absorption for the year.
...
The average asking Full Service Gross (FSG) lease rate per month per foot in San Diego County is currently $2.39, which is a 12.8% decrease over last year’s rate of $2.74 and eight cents lower than last quarter’s rate. The record high rate of $2.76 was established in the first and second quarter of 2008.

Once again, investment in new office space will probably not increase until the vacancy rate is below 10%.

Although Voit didn't provide a similar graph for Las Vegas, the situation is clearly worse:

The amount of occupied space valley-wide fell to 38.2 million, a level not witnessed since the second quarter of 2007. The average vacancy rate reached 22.7 percent, which represented a 0.7-point increase from the preceding quarter (Q2 2009). Compared to the prior year (Q3 2008), vacancies were up 5.7 points from 17.0 percent.
...
On an annualized basis, new supply has dwindled and less than one million square feet of new supply is expected to enter the market during 2009, a figure not seen since 2003. We expect even less development in 2010 with a plug on the development pipe until the supply-demand imbalance corrects itself.

New office construction has slowed significantly in these markets, and will not pick up until vacancy rates drop sharply.