by Calculated Risk on 7/06/2010 12:37:00 PM

Reader Ann (retired lawyer with economics degree) has obtained some publicly available raw data on the long term unemployed from the BLS Current Population Survey. Ann was able to break down the long term unemployed into two age cohorts, 1) 25 to 45, and 2) 45+.

She also broke down the data by four levels of education: 1) no high school degree, 2) high school only, 3) some college or Associates degree, and 4) BA degree or higher.

The following table summarizes the data (click on link to see table - it doesn't fit here):

Table Long Term Unemployed

(1) This includes all who have some college classes but no degree or certificate, those with certificates and those with an associates. Only 30%+/- of the “some college” group has an associates. There is not statistically significant difference in their average length of unemployment as between the ‘few classes’ or ‘certificate’ and an associates..
(2) I do not have the breakdown of all the unemployed by age combined with education. I only have that data for the long-term unemployed.

The first finding is not too surprising for the longer term unemployed:

the average length of unemployment is always higher for the older cohort (45+) regardless of the level of education.

The 2nd finding is a more surprising:

Generally the more education an individual has, the higher the average length of unemployment.

For the long term unemployed, it is better to be younger - and have less education.

Ann adds these comments:

More education = longer unemployment if the job is lost. The upside is the more educated the worker, the less likely they are to lose their job, but the downside of being more educated is that once they hit 45 if they lose their job, they are toast.

So what does one do with the over-45s with a BA or higher? ... The current mantra is 'more education is good for you' but this shows that it can, in the long run, hurt you.

It is tough to find a job, especially if you are older and better educated.

by Calculated Risk on 7/06/2010 10:00:00 AM

The June ISM Non-manufacturing index was at 53.8%, down from 55.4% in May - and below expectations of 55. The employment index showed contraction in June at 49.7%.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the ISM non-manufacturing index (started in January 2008) and the ISM non-manufacturing employment diffusion index.

The employment index is showing contraction again after one month of expansion.

From the Institute for Supply Management: June 2010 Non-Manufacturing ISM Report On Business®

Economic activity in the non-manufacturing sector grew in June for the sixth consecutive month, say the nation's purchasing and supply executives in the latest Non-Manufacturing ISM Report On Business®.

The report was issued today by Anthony Nieves, C.P.M., CFPM, chair of the Institute for Supply Management™ Non-Manufacturing Business Survey Committee; and senior vice president — supply management for Hilton Worldwide. "The NMI (Non-Manufacturing Index) registered 53.8 percent in June, 1.6 percentage points lower than the 55.4 percent registered in May, indicating continued growth in the non-manufacturing sector, but at a slightly slower rate. The Non-Manufacturing Business Activity Index decreased 3 percentage points to 58.1 percent, reflecting growth for the seventh consecutive month. The New Orders Index decreased 2.7 percentage points to 54.4 percent, and the Employment Index decreased 0.7 percentage point to 49.7 percent, reflecting contraction after one month of growth. The Prices Index decreased 6.8 percentage points to 53.8 percent in June, indicating that prices are still increasing but at a slower rate than in May. According to the NMI, 15 non-manufacturing industries reported growth in June. Respondents' comments are mostly positive about business conditions; however, there is concern about the effect of employment on the economic recovery."
emphasis added

by Calculated Risk on 7/06/2010 08:23:00 AM

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the office vacancy rate starting 1991.

Reis is reporting the vacancy rate rose to 17.4% in Q1 2010, up from a revised 17.3% in Q1 (revised up from 17.2%), and up from 16.0% in Q2 2009. The peak following the previous recession was 16.9%.

From Bloomberg Office Vacancy Rate in U.S. Climbs to 17-Year High, Reis Says

The vacancy rate climbed to 17.4 percent from 16 percent a year earlier and 17.3 percent in the first quarter, the New York-based research company said today in a statement. Effective rents, the amount tenants actually pay landlords, fell 5.7 percent from a year earlier and 0.9 percent from the previous three months, according to Reis.

It appears the rate of increases has slowed.

Reis should release the Mall and Apartment vacancy rates over the next few days, and those will probably be at record levels.

by Calculated Risk on 7/05/2010 08:29:00 PM

From Bloomberg: China Property Market Beginning Collapse That May Hit Banks, Rogoff Says (ht jb)

“You’re starting to see that collapse in property and it’s going to hit the banking system,” [Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University professor and former chief economist of the IMF] said today [in an interview with Bloomberg Television in Hong Kong].
...
He also said that while recoveries across the global economy are “very slow,” the danger of a return to recession isn’t “elevated.”

It appears Rogoff is talking about a "collapse" in sales, but price frequently follows volume in real estate - so perhaps he is also talking about a steep decline in prices.

Note: Here is the weekly summary and a look ahead (with plenty of graphs from last week).

The Nikkei is off about 1.5% in early trading.

And from CNBC: Pre-Market Data shows the S&P 500 off over 1% (close to breaking under 1000) and Dow futures are off about 110 points.

Best to all.

by Calculated Risk on 7/05/2010 03:58:00 PM

Just a follow up to the previous posts on oil prices and the 2nd half slowdown ...

From Bloomberg: China Car Sales Grow at Slower Pace; Services Index Slides to 15-Month Low (ht Paulo)

China’s auto sales grew at a slower pace in June and a services-industry index slid to a 15-month low, adding to signs that the economy leading the world recovery is cooling.

Passenger-car purchases rose 10.9 percent from a year earlier, down from May’s 25 percent gain, the China Automotive Technology & Research Center said today. The services-industry measure fell to 55.6 from 56.4, HSBC Holdings Plc and Markit Economics said in an e-mailed statement.

Slowing in China is just one of the 2nd half stories - there is also less stimulus spending, state and local government cutbacks, more household saving impacting consumption, another downturn in housing, and a slowdown and financial issues in Europe.

On the flip side, Yahoo had a headline this morning: 8 Problems That Could Trigger a Double-Dip Recession (ht Brian). Brian joked that this might be a new contrary indicator (like the old magazine cover indicator).