by Calculated Risk on 7/20/2010 10:03:00 AM

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the high and low unemployment rates for each state (and D.C.) since 1976. The red bar is the current unemployment rate (sorted by the current unemployment rate).

Sixteen states and D.C. now have double digit unemployment rates. Arizona and New Jersey are close.

Nevada set a new series high at 14.2% and now has the highest state unemployment rate. Michigan held the top spot for over 4 years until May.

From the BLS: Regional and State Employment and Unemployment Summary

Regional and state unemployment rates were generally lower in June. Thirty-nine states and the District of Columbia recorded unemployment rate decreases, five states had increases and six states had no change, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.
...
Nevada again reported the highest unemployment rate among the states, 14.2 percent in June. The rate in Nevada also set a new series high. (All region, division, and state series begin in 1976.) The states with the next highest rates were Michigan, 13.2 percent; California, 12.3 percent; and Rhode Island, 12.0 percent.
emphasis added

by Calculated Risk on 7/20/2010 08:30:00 AM

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

Total housing starts were at 549 thousand (SAAR) in June, down 5% from the revised May rate of 578,000 (revised down from 593 thousand), and up 15% from the all time record low in April 2009 of 477 thousand (the lowest level since the Census Bureau began tracking housing starts in 1959).

Single-family starts declined 0.7% to 454,000 in June. This is 26% above the record low in January 2009 (360 thousand).

The second graph shows total and single unit starts since 1968. This shows the huge collapse following the housing bubble, and that housing starts have mostly been moving sideways for over a year.

Here is the Census Bureau report on housing Permits, Starts and Completions.

Housing Starts:
Privately-owned housing starts in June were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 549,000. This is 5.0 percent (±13.2%)* below the 13.2%) revised May estimate of 578,000 and is 5.8 percent (±10.5%)* below the June 2009 rate of 583,000.

Single-family housing starts in June were at a rate of 454,000; this is 0.7 percent (±10.7%)* below the revised May figure of 457,000.

Building Permits:
Privately-owned housing units authorized by building permits in June were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 586,000. This is 2.1 percent (±2.1%)* above the revised May rate of 574,000, but is 2.3 percent (±2.0%) below the June 2009 estimate of 600,000.

Single-family authorizations in June were at a rate of 421,000; this is 3.4 percent (±1.8%) below the revised May figure of 436,000.

This is way below expectations of 580 thousand (I took the under!), and is good news for the housing market longer term (there are too many housing units already), but bad news for the economy and employment short term.

by Calculated Risk on 7/19/2010 11:42:00 PM

A little music to go along with the Sovereign Debt series ...

by Calculated Risk on 7/19/2010 07:40:00 PM

Earlier I mentioned I wasn't sure if the unemployment benefit extension would pass - it looks like it will pass tomorrow.

The WSJ reports Senate Set to Extend Jobless Benefits

On Tuesday, Democrats are likely to get the 60 votes they need to extend the benefits through November. ... The House is expected to approve the Senate's version Wednesday and send it to Mr. Obama for his signature.

Note: this is an extension of the qualification dates for existing tiers of extended unemployment benefits, not additional weeks of benefits.

by Calculated Risk on 7/19/2010 04:40:00 PM

Moody's reported today that the Moody’s/REAL All Property Type Aggregate Index increased 3.6% in May. This is a repeat sales measure of commercial real estate prices.

Below is a comparison of the Moodys/REAL Commercial Property Price Index (CPPI) and the Case-Shiller composite 20 index.

Notes: Beware of the "Real" in the title - this index is not inflation adjusted. Moody's CRE price index is a repeat sales index like Case-Shiller - but there are far fewer commercial sales - and that can impact prices.

Click on graph for larger image in new window.

CRE prices only go back to December 2000.

The Case-Shiller Composite 20 residential index is in blue (with Dec 2000 set to 1.0 to line up the indexes).

It is possible that commercial real prices have bottomed - in general - but it is hard to tell because the number of transactions is very low and there are a number of distressed sales.

Commercial real estate values are now down 6.3% over the last year, and down 38.9% from the peak in late 2007.

Comments from PIMCO

As I've noted every month, this is a very thin market that is skewed by distressed sales. John Murray at PIMCO also cautioned about the CPPI index in a recent note: PIMCO U.S. Commercial Real Estate Project

National price indices such as the Moody’s Commercial Property Price Index (CPPI) can provide misleading indications of a recovery in CRE asset price levels. Since November 2009, the index has rebounded 3%.

While it is natural to draw comparisons between the CPPI and the S&P/Case-Shiller index used to gauge residential home prices, we caution that indexes such as the CPPI are relatively meaningless in today’s limited transaction environment – commercial real estate transaction volume fell nearly 90% from 2007 to 2009.

Our ride along meetings highlight another limitation of the CPPI. Based on repeat transactions, the index excludes the truly distressed or overpriced properties acquired in the past few years that have yet to trade, and is instead skewed by the high proportion of trophy asset and Agency-financed multifamily transactions.

Comments from MIT Professor David Geltner

Dr. Geltner writes a column that appears on the Real Estate Analytics LLC website on the lower right under "Professor's Corner". This is based on last month's data, but still explains the market dynamics:

CPPI advanced in April, due to the very strong performance of “healthy” properties (i.e., those without the RCA “troubled asset” flag). Figure 4 shows that the healthy property breakout index (estimated using the same methodology as the CPPI only dropping out the “troubled assets”) rose 6.3% from March to April while the “distressed” index declined more than 5%. The “healthy property index” is now only 33% below the October 2007 peak, while properties falling into distress since then are still selling more than 50% below 2007 values on average.

Graph from Dr. Geltner.

Whereas 2009 saw the advent of a bifurcated market between “healthy” and “distressed” properties, 2010 is now seeing what might be called a “trifurcated” market. Not only are distressed properties selling at sharp discounts, but “trophy” properties and solid “core” assets are selling at very respectable prices well above the general market average.

Roughly, CRE prices are moving up for "trophy" properties, moving sideways for the general market, and falling again for distressed properties. But this is based on very few transactions ...