by Calculated Risk on 12/13/2010 03:39:00 PM

• Tax Legislation

If you are bored, here is the C-Span Link for the Senate vote.

From the Senate rules: "Under the cloture rule (Rule XXII), the Senate may limit consideration of a pending matter to 30 additional hours, but only by vote of three-fifths of the full Senate, normally 60 votes."

Most estimates are the cloture vote will receive close to 70 votes (the vote will stay open for some time because of bad weather). Then there will be 30 hours of additional "debate" (talking to an empty chamber) and then the final vote in the Senate will probably be on Wednesday.

Both Senators Reid and McConnell agreed to keep the Senate in session over the weekend and into next week, if needed, to make sure the bill passed. The only question is what will happen in the House?

• From Reuters: ECB eyes seeking capital hike - sources

The European Central Bank is considering requesting an increase in its capital from euro zone member states, euro zone central bank sources told Reuters, as a cushion against any potential losses from its bond buying.

The ECB has been buying bonds of weaker euro zone countries (probably mostly Greece, Ireland, and Portugal).

by Calculated Risk on 12/13/2010 12:36:00 PM

There have been quite a few bearish articles recently about the muni market. Not long ago there were even some "scary charts" showing a sharp sell off for the muni market, and at that time Bond Girl pointed out the correction was not because of imminent muni defaults, but because of the end of the Build America Bond (BAB) program.

For those who want to know more about munis, here is an ubernerd post from Bond Girl at Self-evident.org: Default and bankruptcy in the municipal bond market (part one)

I am just writing this post to demystify a process that evidently needs demystifying. ...

One of the more frustrating aspects of muni market coverage in the news and blogosphere is the tendency to talk about municipal debt as if only one type of bond is issued and traded. There is actually considerable diversity among borrowers in the muni market (e.g., they are not all government entities), and by extension, the types of commitments that are made for the repayment of the debt. Although the relative health of the muni market has macroeconomic consequences, this is in many ways a market that defies generalization. (That’s one reason I find the muni market unusually interesting ...) The defaults that have taken place both before and during the economic downturn are what finance-types would refer to as storied credits. I often see people describing Jefferson County, Alabama, as the “canary in the coal mine” of muni defaults. Suggesting that Jefferson County, which was the center of a widely-publicized securities fraud case, is a typical muni credit is kind of like portraying Enron as a typical corporate credit. ... Another example would be Florida dirt bonds, which are backed by special assessments on property in a severely depressed market. These are not borrowers that were forced to establish their spending priorities or were muddling through difficult times; these are borrowers that experienced sudden and catastrophic losses and derived their revenues from limited sources.

Types of municipal bonds

The obvious starting place on this topic is to explain the types of muni bonds that are issued. Municipal bonds are broadly divided into two classes: general obligation (GO) and revenue bonds. The difference between GO and revenue bonds is the specific security that is pledged to repay the debt. (Bonds may also be issued with more than one kind of security and may involve a moral obligation pledge that implies contingent financial support from another entity with stronger credit.) GO bonds are secured by the full faith and credit of the issuer, meaning that the borrower is committing to raise taxes and other revenues sufficient to cover the amount owed.

Revenue bonds are secured by a defined stream of revenues. Whether the principal and interest on these bonds is paid in a timely manner depends upon: (1) the reliability of the specific revenues pledged; and (2) whether that revenue stream has been pledged toward other debt or is used for other purposes.

It is important that you understand what kind of bond you have. ...

There is much more on munis at the post.

by Calculated Risk on 12/13/2010 09:00:00 AM

Note that the slight decline in homeowners with negative equity was mostly due to foreclosures.

First American CoreLogic released the Q3 2010 negative equity report today.

CoreLogic reports that 10.8 million, or 22.5 percent, of all residential properties with mortgages were in negative equity at the end of the third quarter of 2010, down from 11.0 million and 23 percent in the second quarter. This is due primarily to foreclosures of severely negative equity properties rather than an increase in home values.

During this year the number of borrowers in negative equity has declined by over 500,000 borrowers. An additional 2.4 million borrowers had less than five percent equity in the third quarter. Together, negative equity and near-negative equity mortgages accounted for 27.5 percent of all residential properties with a mortgage nationwide.
...
"Negative equity is a primary factor holding back the housing market and broader economy. The good news is that negative equity is slowly declining, but the bad news is that price declines are accelerating, which may put a stop to or reverse the recent improvement in negative equity," said Mark Fleming, chief economist with CoreLogic.

Here are a couple of graphs from the report:

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

This graph shows the distribution of negative equity (and near negative equity). The more negative equity, the more at risk the homeowner is to losing their home.

About 10% of homeowners with mortgages have more than 25% negative equity - although the percent of homeowners with severe negative equity has been declining over the last few quarters mostly because of homes lost to foreclosure.

The second graph shows the break down of equity by state.

In Nevada very few homeowners with mortgages have any equity, whereas in New York almost half have over 50%.

As Mark Fleming noted, the number of homeowners with negative might increase over the next few quarters with declining home prices.

by Calculated Risk on 12/12/2010 11:35:00 PM

From the WSJ: Tax Deal Set to Pass Senate

Three Senate aides said the tax package appeared likely to attract at least 65 to 70 supporters Monday in a procedural vote in the Senate to test whether there is support to block a potential filibuster. Sixty votes are needed for the bill to cross that hurdle. A vote on final passage is expected a day or two later.

The key is the House. The plan was to adjourn by Friday, but the session could be extended to the following week.

Earlier:
• Here is the busy economic schedule for the coming week.
• Here is the Summary of last week

by Calculated Risk on 12/12/2010 05:35:00 PM

The FOMC meets on Tuesday, and this will probably be a boring statement - and therefore this is a boring preview!

Perhaps the FOMC will use the statement to defend their decision to launch "QE2" in November. But it is very unlikely there will be any change to FOMC policy, and there will probably be no material change to the statement.

I expect:
• The target range for the federal funds rate to remain at 0 to 1/4 percent
• The policy of reinvestment of principal payments to remain
• and for no change to the plan to purchase an additional $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end of June 2011.

For the FOMC statement, I expect the key sentence "likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period" to remain, and even though there has been some improvement in the recent economics news, the first paragraph will probably be about the same. The following is from the Nov 3rd statement:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in September confirms that the pace of recovery in output and employment continues to be slow. Household spending is increasing gradually, but remains constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Business spending on equipment and software is rising, though less rapidly than earlier in the year, while investment in nonresidential structures continues to be weak. Employers remain reluctant to add to payrolls. Housing starts continue to be depressed. Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable, but measures of underlying inflation have trended lower in recent quarters.

Change "September" to "November" and nothing has changed.

• Kansas City Fed President Thomas Hoenig will cast his last no vote. The regional Fed presidents rotate on the FOMC, and Hoenig will not be a voting member of the FOMC next year (edit: he will be an alternate member).

Earlier:
• Here is the busy economic schedule for the coming week.
• Here is the Summary of last week

by Calculated Risk on 12/12/2010 01:30:00 PM

"This is just as scary as people lobbing mortars over your head at 2 o'clock in the morning."
James Mitchell, a 64-year-old Vietnam veteran who lost his job in early 2009 and is about to exhaust his unemployment benefits.

As I mentioned last week, the proposed tax legislation provides no additional help for the so-called "99ers". The "extension of the unemployment benefits" is an extension of the qualifying dates for the various tiers of benefits, and not additional weeks of benefits.

The above quote is from an article by Richard Read in the Oregonian: Oregon aid agencies brace for tens of thousands losing unemployment benefits

Each week, about 600 Oregonians exhaust jobless benefits. In January, about 4,000 a week will lose coverage. And state officials expect those numbers to spike in April when more than 35,000 people will exhaust benefits in a single week.
...
If Congress acts within days to extend emergency unemployment compensation nationally, 14,000 fewer Oregonians will lose benefits in April. But President Barack Obama's proposed extensions ... won't do anything for those who exhaust the maximum 99 weeks of jobless benefits.
...
The mass exhaustion of benefits, an echo effect of the great recession, is unprecedented ...

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

This graph shows the change in payroll jobs each month. The peak job losses were in early 2009 - and 99 weeks is just under two years - so many of those people will be exhausting their benefits over the next few months.

There is much more in Richard Read's article - he discusses how the local aid agencies in Oregon are preparing to help, but there is only so much they can do.